Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-26 Thread merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2020-05-26 20:41, Étienne Mollier wrote: > It makes sense. In that particular case though, after a bit of > reading and quite some testing, the resulting Cephes.pm > regenerated by swig fails the build time testing. I don't > exclude this is caused by a mishandling of mine with sw

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-26 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-26 22:01:41 +0200: > If I were you I would formally commit your try and ask on debian-mentors > (may be adding some diff between the upstream version and the generated > one). In case it does not trigger some help I agree that for the moment > the upstream pr

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:41:48PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > Swig wrappers could (and, in my understanding of Debian policies of > > rebuilding things from source, should) be regenerated from Cephes.i file. > > It makes sense. In that particular case though, after a bit of >

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-26 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andrius, mer...@debian.org, on 2020-05-20 06:24:47 +0300: > On 2020-05-19 23:01, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > For what it's worth, looking at the C code embeded into the Perl > > modules, this seems to be the result of a swig wrapping. I'm a > > bit unsure how the relinking is supposed to occur

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-19 Thread merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2020-05-19 23:01, Étienne Mollier wrote: > For what it's worth, looking at the C code embeded into the Perl > modules, this seems to be the result of a swig wrapping. I'm a > bit unsure how the relinking is supposed to occur in that kind > of cases (maybe it's not too hard, I just

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-19 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Hi Andrius, mer...@debian.org, on 2020-05-19 12:02:15 +0300: > On 2020-05-19 09:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:45:41AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > > > Embedded copies of netlib seem abundant in Debian [1]. I suggest looking > > > into debian/copyright of

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-19 Thread merkys
Hi Andreas, On 2020-05-19 09:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:45:41AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: >> Embedded copies of netlib seem abundant in Debian [1]. I suggest looking >> into debian/copyright of these packages. It is curious, however, that >> netlib is not packaged

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:45:41AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > > source code for extra copyright statements will be needed here. > > Hopefully, should DFSG changes be required, they won't impede on > > the proper operation of the package. > > > > [1] https://metacpan.org/pod/Math::MatrixReal

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-18 Thread merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2020-05-19 00:30, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Thank you, that does quite a job to put a decent git repository > together! Glad this helped! > I'm a bit more concerned on Math::Cephes[2] side, but not from a > technical point of view though; it is seamless on the side of > git-buildpa

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-18 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andrius, Andrius Merkys, on 2020-05-16 14:41:53 +0300: > There's dh-make-perl tool from similarly named Debian package. In your case > the following should be a good starting point: > > dh-make-perl --cpan Statistics::PCA Thank you, that does quite a job to put a decent git repository togethe

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-16 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello, On Sat, 16 May 2020, 12:56 Étienne Mollier, wrote: > Sounds good, I understood they may have some routines for > converting CPAN entries into Debian packages. Will check with > them. There's dh-make-perl tool from similarly named Debian package. In your case the following should be a g

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-16 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-16 11:35:48 +0200: > I fully agree. BTW, in the debian/TODO you wrote about the missing > Statistics::PCA. As far as my experience with Perl modules packaging > reaches its relatively easy to create Perl packages. Do you want to > take the challenge to enab

Re: RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 09:53:08AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I had a look at the QA page of prinseq-lite and saw a failure in > the autopkgtest[1]. The prinseq-graphs command is missing two > dependencies, and thus choke on the following test: > > prinseq-graphs --versio

RFS: prinseq-lite: added dependencies to fix autopkgtest failures

2020-05-16 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Everyone, I had a look at the QA page of prinseq-lite and saw a failure in the autopkgtest[1]. The prinseq-graphs command is missing two dependencies, and thus choke on the following test: prinseq-graphs --version [1] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/prinseq-l