Re: Plastimatch new version

2022-11-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:27:43PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Gregory Sharp, on 2022-11-18: > > Thank you, you are correct! Yahoo blocked your direct e-mail, but it also > > blocked the one from debian-med which is not good. > > Things that happen I guess. For what it's worth

Re: Plastimatch new version

2022-11-18 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Greg, Gregory Sharp, on 2022-11-18: > Thank you, you are correct! Yahoo blocked your direct e-mail, but it also > blocked the one from debian-med which is not good. Things that happen I guess. For what it's worth this prompted me to check my own provider didn't change dkim settings behind my

Re: Plastimatch new version

2022-11-18 Thread Gregory Sharp
HI Etienne, Thank you, you are correct! Yahoo blocked your direct e-mail, but it also blocked the one from debian-med which is not good. Looks like I did not correctly understand autopkgtest. Would you recommend reverting the debian-tests-data removal or adjusting run-unit-test? And how do I

Re: Plastimatch new version

2022-11-17 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Greg, Gregory Sharp, on 2022-11-17: > Just a ping. This is still ready for review and upload. Please let me know if > I missed something. Your mail provider seems to have filtered out [1], so I retry with my debian.org address (in case I broke something with my emlwks999.eu one; I'm not an em

Re: Plastimatch new version

2022-11-17 Thread Gregory Sharp
Hi all, Just a ping. This is still ready for review and upload. Please let me know if I missed something. Thanks! Greg Sharp gregsh...@geocities.com On Thursday, November 3, 2022, 03:14:53 PM EDT, Gregory Sharp wrote: Happy Thursday everyone. I have updated plastimatch for the ne

Re: Plastimatch new version

2022-11-03 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Greg, Gregory Sharp, on 2022-11-03: > Happy Thursday everyone. Wishing you the same :) > I have updated plastimatch for the new upstream version, and it is ready for > review and upload. Please don't forget to adjust the d/t/run-unit-test after removal of test data. for the moment, I see t

Plastimatch new version

2022-11-03 Thread Gregory Sharp
Happy Thursday everyone. I have updated plastimatch for the new upstream version, and it is ready for review and upload. Thank you, Greg Sharp gregsh...@geocities.com

Re: Plastimatch new version

2020-03-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gregory, On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:13:47PM +, Gregory Sharp wrote: > Hi all,I have uploaded the new plastimatch version into Salsa.  > Also the failing test case is now fixed.Thank you,Greg Thanks a lot. I've uploaded the package. Please make sure you do `git pull` to get some addition

Plastimatch new version

2020-03-19 Thread Gregory Sharp
Hi all,I have uploaded the new plastimatch version into Salsa.  Also the failing test case is now fixed.Thank you,Greg

Re: Plastimatch new version

2017-12-19 Thread Gregory Sharp
Hi Andreas, > For the next upstream version you might like to fix this: > > I: plastimatch: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/libplmbase.so.1.7 > Verticies Vertices I: plastimatch: spelling-error-in-binary > usr/lib/libplmbase.so.1.7 transfrom transform I: plastimatch: > spelling-error-in-binary

Re: Plastimatch new version

2017-12-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gregory, On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:33:30PM -0500, Gregory Sharp wrote: > I have (attempted to) update plastimatch for the new version. Thanks for your work on this. I've done a source upload right now. For the next upstream version you might like to fix this: I: plastimatch: spelling-error