Current status packaging GT.M ? (Was: Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bhaskar, On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:16:28AM -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > > GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises. We want this for Debian. No compromises. :-) So this is just a ping about current status. > The current install script is designed for interactive use and pro

Re: Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu)

2010-02-03 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises. On 02/03/2010 02:39 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:30:52PM -0800, Jonathan Tai wrote: [KSB] <...snip...> So the question whether to build as root or not on Alioth is void. The Debian building tools are using fa

Re: Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu)

2010-02-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:30:52PM -0800, Jonathan Tai wrote: > It's just another version of GT.M -- 5.3004 and 5.3004A are different > versions. (Debian packaging doesn't allow capital letters in the > version number, IIRC, so I lowercased it.) We support multiple versions > of GT.M simultaneous

Re: Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu)

2010-02-02 Thread Jonathan Tai
The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or may be covered under the Privacy Act, 5 USC 552(a), and/or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (PL 104-191) and its various implementing regulations and must be protected in accordance with those provisions..

Re: Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu)

2010-02-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:08:09PM -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > Your e-mail is very timely - we just announced a major new GT.M release > today (see http://fis-gtm.com)! :) Congratulations to this release. > Jon has set up an Ubuntu repository (see > https://medsphere.org/docs/DOC-1722) and h

Re: Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu)

2010-02-02 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
Andreas -- Your e-mail is very timely - we just announced a major new GT.M release today (see http://fis-gtm.com)! This release includes the new scripting that makes GT.M easier to run out of the box. There is now a "gtm" script that sets up reasonable defaults for environment variables (the

Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu)

2010-02-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:10:31AM -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > > [KSB] I found I needed to rework some of the user scripts in the GT.M > distribution first, which I will get into the GT.M packages. But it > appears that creating Debian friendly packages - not just binary packages > but Debia

Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:10:31AM -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: >> > these limitations by hacking the GT.M installer script and installing in >> > a fake chroot, but have run into problems with these approaches that I >> > believe will require upstream changes to GT.M to resolve. >> >> So most pro

Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-23 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises. On 11/23/2009 04:24 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Jonathan, thanks fro your quick reply. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:09:56AM -0800, Jonathan Tai wrote: > I've been packaging GT.M for Ubuntu for a few months now with the aim of > makin

Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jonathan, thanks fro your quick reply. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:09:56AM -0800, Jonathan Tai wrote: > I've been packaging GT.M for Ubuntu for a few months now with the aim of > making OpenVista easier to install on Ubuntu. I've succeeded in > creating packages that can be installed and remov

Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-23 Thread Jonathan Tai
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 23:47 -0800, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Bhaskar, hi Jonathan > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 05:56:19PM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > > Am Sonntag 22 November 2009 17:52:42 schrieb Sebastian Hilbert: > > > I remember there was talk on the Debian med list about a Debian package

Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bhaskar, hi Jonathan On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 05:56:19PM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > Am Sonntag 22 November 2009 17:52:42 schrieb Sebastian Hilbert: > > I remember there was talk on the Debian med list about a Debian package for > > OpenVista. > > > Maybe this link is helpful. > > https:

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-22 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:30:59PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > Am Sonntag 22 November 2009 17:52:42 schrieb Sebastian Hilbert: > > > I remember there was talk on the Debian med list about a Debian package > > for > > > OpenVista. > > > > > Maybe this link is helpful. > > > > https://medsphe

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-22 Thread Karsten Hilbert
> Am Sonntag 22 November 2009 17:52:42 schrieb Sebastian Hilbert: > > I remember there was talk on the Debian med list about a Debian package > for > > OpenVista. > > > Maybe this link is helpful. > > https://medsphere.org/download/project/gtm The problem with mumps is that it needs to be bootst

Re: OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-22 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
Am Sonntag 22 November 2009 17:52:42 schrieb Sebastian Hilbert: > I remember there was talk on the Debian med list about a Debian package for > OpenVista. > Maybe this link is helpful. https://medsphere.org/download/project/gtm Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.de

OpenVista for Ubuntu

2009-11-22 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
I remember there was talk on the Debian med list about a Debian package for OpenVista. I came across that link https://medsphere.org/docs/DOC-1722 which seems to indicate there is an experimental Ubuntu package. Maybe someone could check suitability for inclusion into Debian med. Sebastian