Re: New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

Hi again, Le 03/02/2022 à 22:22, Andreas Tille a écrit : Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:42:40PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: Yes, just before looking at king/libpdfbox-graphics2d-java I was updating snpeff and seeing if I could turn some unit tests into autopkgtests -- and I trust I can, this is my

Re: New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:42:40PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > > Yes, just before looking at king/libpdfbox-graphics2d-java I was updating > snpeff and seeing if I could turn some unit tests into autopkgtests -- and I > trust I can, this is my current task. Fine. > So if you think putting snp

Re: New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

Hi Andreas, Le 03/02/2022 à 10:31, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi, Am Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 09:49:32PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: I did the upload -- I agree autopkgtests would be valuable, still. Yet I remember the tests I did when designing the package last Spring, and I feel providing a dataset

New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

Hi, Am Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 09:49:32PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > I did the upload -- I agree autopkgtests would be valuable, still. Yet I > remember the tests I did when designing the package last Spring, and I feel > providing a dataset is necessary for even a basic use of snpeff, which, I >