Hey guys,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> having upstream and ftpmaster in the team is pure fun. :-)
>
;)
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
>
Hi Thorsten,
having upstream and ftpmaster in the team is pure fun. :-)
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> >GPL wise it's all done I think.
> >It's all committed including the new pristine tar 1.
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
GPL wise it's all done I think.
It's all committed including the new pristine tar 1.3.
wow, that was fast.
Please let me know if you find any other weirdness.
From my point of view everything is fine now.
@Andreas: I am waiting
Hi Thorsten,
GPL wise it's all done I think.
It's all committed including the new pristine tar 1.3.
Please let me know if you find any other weirdness.
Regards,
Jorge
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jorge Sebastião Soares <
j.s.soa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> :)
>
> On Wed, Jan
Hi Thorsten,
:)
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> Uploaded ... waiting for acception by ftpmaster.
>>
>
> So this is my moment to ask questions :-)
>
> debian/copyright says:
> Files: *
> License: GPL-2+
>
> But the a
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Uploaded ... waiting for acception by ftpmaster.
So this is my moment to ask questions :-)
debian/copyright says:
Files: *
License: GPL-2+
But the accompanying commentary says something about GPLv3+ (as do the
headers of the src/* files).
On th
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> [full quote since the mail (again) ended up as PM but was probably
> intended to go to the list]
>
>
Definitely intended for the list and not PM.
Sorry...
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:00:41AM +, Jorge Sebas
Hi Jorge,
[full quote since the mail (again) ended up as PM but was probably
intended to go to the list]
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:00:41AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> Hey Andreas,
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 20
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:37:59AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > If there is a real test-suite to run you can do this
> >
> >a) at package build time
> >
>
> This is already happening. The package only builds if it passes the tests.
> And they are only relevant from a dev
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:13:13PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > No. That's definitely not good since it belongs to the manpage
> > and you will (hopefully) not find long descriptions like this.
> > The above could be summarised like
> >
> > It is featuring different output
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:45:36PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> I am including a bit of information on what actually is a SNP on the long
> the decription of the snp-sites binary.
Good.
> I was also thinking of adding the usage details like:
>
> Usage: snp_sites [-mvph] [-o
Hi Andreas, all
I am including a bit of information on what actually is a SNP on the long
the decription of the snp-sites binary.
I was also thinking of adding the usage details like:
Usage: snp_sites [-mvph] [-o output_filename]
This program finds snp sites from a multi fasta alignment file.
-
Hey Andreas,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:58:28PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > > W: snp-sites source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is
> > > 3.9.5)
> > >
> > > which is probably hidden from your sig
Hi Jorge,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:58:28PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > W: snp-sites source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is
> > 3.9.5)
> >
> > which is probably hidden from your sight if you do not use the latest
> > lintian
> > from Debian unstable.
>
>
> That's
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> snp-sites looks quite good now.
:)
Hooray!
Thank you for the feedback and thank you for guiding me through all this.
> I have one remaining lintian warning:
>
> W: snp-sites source: out-of-date-standards-ver
Hi Jorge,
snp-sites looks quite good now. I have one remaining lintian warning:
W: snp-sites source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is 3.9.5)
which is probably hidden from your sight if you do not use the latest lintian
from Debian unstable. Since I'm usually fixing this via
Hi Jorge,
I guess you forget to push (may be there was a conflict with
not-up-to-date repository since I fixed the changelog file and forgot to
tell you. You had a series of non-sense changelog entries and only the
last one is evaluated to close the ITP bug.
Please sort this out and push the pri
Hi Jorge,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:43:37PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> I have filed the ITP. Bug number: 735180
OK. Next time it makes sense to answer the question whether this report
should be send to some additional e-mail address with the address of the
Debian Med maintainers (as
Hi Andreas,
I have filed the ITP. Bug number: 735180
I don't know if you've seen this come through. I have on debian bug report
mailing list.
I have removed the boilerplate stuff from the rules file.
The package builds and lintian sees no problem.
I have committed all my changes to the debian gi
Hey Andreas,
Sorry for you having to send this info once again.
I got the new tarball.
Thank you. It helped a lot.
Regards,
Jorge
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:47PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
>
Hi Jorge,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:10:01AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> In creating the ITP through reportbug, there are two things that are
> puzzling me.
>
> The first one is, since I closed the first snp-sites ITP bug, I was
> assuming that there wouldn't be a snp-
Hi Jorge,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:47PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Having made the necessary changes for the header files to be installed to
> /usr/include/snp-sites, I have tagged this release as 1.1.
> I can't get gbp to see this new tag.
$ uscan --verbose
-- S
Hi Andreas,
Having made the necessary changes for the header files to be installed to
/usr/include/snp-sites, I have tagged this release as 1.1.
I can't get gbp to see this new tag.
Any suggestions welcome.
Regards,
Jorge
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jorge Sebastião Soares <
j.s.soa...@
Hi Andreas,
In creating the ITP through reportbug, there are two things that are
puzzling me.
The first one is, since I closed the first snp-sites ITP bug, I was
assuming that there wouldn't be a snp-sites package:
js21@builder:~/deb_alioth/snp-sites$ reportbug --email j.s.soares@gmail.comwnpp
*
Hey Andreas,
Addressing this:
> No. They were originally moved to debian/tmp/usr/share which does not
> make any sense at all. Afterwards we are moving it to /usr/include
> inside the Debian package which is where I would have expected header
> files also after a plain `make install` of the sou
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:59:53AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > Homework: Try removing one or both of these lines and try to build the
> > package.
>
> If Conflicts or Provides section is not present, package creation aborts
> and handy hook shell drop-in script kicks in.
> Very n
Hey Andreas
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:57:31PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
>
> > > I hope you also noticed the additional Provides /
> > > Conflicts lines in d/control. D-shlibs will issue an error if these
> are
> > > missing.
Hi Jorge,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:57:31PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > Yep, no problem. I think by this small implementation it was more
> > educating as if I would have explained lengthy. The fun part of this is
> > that you now might be able to educate Sascha how he could use d-
Hi Jorge,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:37:16PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > D-shlibs is caring for installing the lib files and thus you can get rid
> > of these install files (which is part of the deal why d-shlibs is
> > comfortable and I was suggesting using it).
> >
> >
> I get it no
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:41:58AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > > Creating library packages is a bit more advanced task. Since you have
> > > decided to be brave and created these you should finish the hard way,
>
Hi Jorge,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:41:58AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > Creating library packages is a bit more advanced task. Since you have
> > decided to be brave and created these you should finish the hard way,
> > thought.
>
> I start to regret it... :)
Well, that's a shame
Hi Andreas,
Pasting here issues discussed on th eother thread:
> No. Lintian tells you exactly what you need to do. *Since* you are
> using compat level 9 you really *need* to bump also the versioned
> Build-Depends to 9 (currently you have 8). This is not the kind of
> warning you should ove
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:27:21PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > Creating library packages is a bit more advanced task. Since you have
> > decided to be brave and created these you should finish the hard way,
> > thought.
>
> It was Sasha's recommendation. And a good recomme
Hey Andreas,
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> :-)
>
> It is good to build a positive feeling about gbp to come over the hard
> times you might have in some point in time. Sometimes it takes a bit
> longer to make real friends between a developer and gbp. ;-)
>
>
hehe!
I am
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:37:23PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> I had created the pristine tarball with:
>
> uscan --force-download
>
>
> > I'd recommend to fetch the current status at git.debian.org (best via
> >
> >gbp-pull
> >
> > since this also fetches upstream and
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I then copied over your old debian/ dir and also adapted the version
> number since it was only 1 before but now we need 1.0. Feel free to
>
>gbp-pull
>
> since I commited this status now to git.debian.org.
>
Done.
>
> >
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:28:06PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> >> $ uscan --verbose --report
> >> -- Scanning for watchfiles in .
> >> -- Found watchfile in ./debian
> >> -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
> >>https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/snp_sites/tags
Hey Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Jorge Sebastião Soares <
j.s.soa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> If I were you I would wait until upstream is tagged properly. Once this
>> is done do
>>
>>
>> $ uscan --verbose --report
>> -- Scann
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:01:42PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > If you write to Debian mailing lists people will even tell you that you
> > should only reply to the list and not to the poster. For sure we are
> > tolerant to newbies ... but in principle I do not need another
Hey Andreas,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> If you write to Debian mailing lists people will even tell you that you
> should only reply to the list and not to the poster. For sure we are
> tolerant to newbies ... but in principle I do not need another copy of a
> mai
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:04:39AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> Gmail defaults to reply instead of reply all...
If you write to Debian mailing lists people will even tell you that you
should only reply to the list and not to the poster. For sure we are
tolerant to newbies ...
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> please stick to open discussion on Debian Med list. I guess you will
> not mind if I full quote your prer-technical, non-personal mail.
>
>
No problem.
Gmail defaults to reply instead of reply all...
> On Mon, J
Hi Jorge,
please stick to open discussion on Debian Med list. I guess you will
not mind if I full quote your prer-technical, non-personal mail.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:48:21AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > I checked the Git repository and for some strange reason the build
> > total
Hi Jorge,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:18:27PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> Anyway, I'm just happy I had committed the package to git before hand.
>
> > Yes, please commit all your changes soon - otherwise it is hard to
> > verify the reason of your problem above.
> >
>
> Already done.
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:15:14AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > All the files were present but I believe that the permissions on the
> debian
> > files were completely messed up.
> > I don't know if yo
Hi Jorge,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:15:14AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> All the files were present but I believe that the permissions on the debian
> files were completely messed up.
> I don't know if you have ever come across this before.
No, sorry. No idea how this might happen.
>
Hi Andreas, all,
Sorry for the time it took to get back to you on this.
I had to reinstall my debian VM as I ran out of space.
I found that when I copied my debian folder to a folder on my host machine,
something wasn't quite right.
All the files were present but I believe that the permissions on
Hi Jorge,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:59:10PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> I understood now.
> I have removed all the .ex files.
> Sascha had told me to remove them before and I did. I rebuilt the package
> from source this morning using as you said dh-make to create the debian
> folder a
Hi Andreas,
I understood now.
I have removed all the .ex files.
Sascha had told me to remove them before and I did. I rebuilt the package
from source this morning using as you said dh-make to create the debian
folder and the pristine tar ball and they came back.
I need to make some alterations to
Hi again Jorge,
since you have contact to upstream: It would be highly advisable to
.gitignore the autom4te.cache to prevent it from beeing included into
the release tarball. It ends up here as unneeded cruft that could be
avoided.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To
Hi Jorge,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:44:36PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> I see it clearly now.
> It's a lot of codumentation and I have to say I did get lost.
> I will try this after lunch and will report back.
I checked out your commit (not only NSA is watching, right ;-)) and need
to
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:31:46AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> >
> > I have submitted my public key to Alioth and I'm trying to clone the
> > tux4kids project as described in the Alioth git examples (git
Hi Jorge,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:31:46AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
>
> I have submitted my public key to Alioth and I'm trying to clone the
> tux4kids project as described in the Alioth git examples (git-blurb.txt).
> But I keep getting this:
Any specific reason for taking this pa
Hi Gert,
That does help.
I had uploaded my public key two days ago already.
I'll read through the document you sent and see if I did something wrong.
Regards,
Jorge
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> > Form the above can you see what the problem is?
> There i
Hi Jorge,
> Form the above can you see what the problem is?
There is a cron job that runs only every hour to put the ssh key in the
proper place, and for first timers there is also a 24 hour turnover.
For details see https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH
Hope that help,
Gert
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>
> Ahh, OK. Feel free to commit whatever your state of packaging is to
> git.debian.org and we'll have a look.
>
I have submitted my public key to Alioth and I'm trying to clone the
tux4kids project as described in the Alioth
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:23:20PM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> > packaging code. Serving as proxy in case of things we would like to
> > ask upstream at Sanger and so on.
> >
> >
> I'm happy to help in that role.
:-)
> Also, now with Sascha Steinbiss (working by my side and
Hi Andreas, all,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, if you are reading our mailing list, provide information what
> should be packaged or how we could enhancing packaging thit would be
> really cool. Moreover becoming a member of the Alioth team and commit
> packaging
Hi Jorge,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:58:32AM +, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote:
> Thank you for getting back to me so quickly.
> Really apreciate it.
:-)
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > It would be really good to have a strong contact to the Sanger
> > Institute.
Hi all,
Thank you for getting back to me so quickly.
Really apreciate it.
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 08:35:32PM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
> > > My name is Jorge Soares and I have taken on the task to package a piece
> > > of softwar
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 08:35:32PM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
> > My name is Jorge Soares and I have taken on the task to package a piece
> > of software written by the Pathogen Informatics team at the Sanger
> > Institute.
It would be really good to have a strong contact to the Sanger
Insti
Hi Jorge,
2013/11/29 Jorge Sebastião Soares
>
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Jorge Soares and I have taken on the task to package a piece
of software written by the Pathogen Informatics team at the Sanger
Institute.
>
> I am using pduilber to automate as much as possible the package creation.
>
> I hav
Hi all,
My name is Jorge Soares and I have taken on the task to package a piece of
software written by the Pathogen Informatics team at the Sanger Institute.
I am using pduilber to automate as much as possible the package creation.
I have what I assume to be a source debian package with me:
snp
63 matches
Mail list logo
