Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2023-01-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 10:35:37PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > Version 3.x of ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk are now in unstable, and looking > good. Please do not make further uploads of either, or of skesa, until > they migrate unless absolutely necessary. Thanks a lot for all your work on this. I'm

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2023-01-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Version 3.x of ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk are now in unstable, and looking good. Please do not make further uploads of either, or of skesa, until they migrate unless absolutely necessary. Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuf

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, thanks for all your work on this. Am Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 11:08:31PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > I realized at the last minute (in the course of confirming that sra-sdk > passes its autopkgtest) that I never merged in ngs-sdk's, which is > likely to need formal adjustments per layout

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-11-13 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
"Aaron M. Ucko" writes: > Meanwhile, I pushed some more tuneups, mostly related to tests; in > particular, I arranged to label and exclude all online tests, including > for better or worse some tests that were failing even with Internet > access. I also made the Python binary package Architectur

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-16 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Pierre Gruet writes: > Hmm, I did not have in mind that the package is ready for amd64 > only. If this is the case, then yes, we should not use Architecture: > all at the moment (which is otherwise the general rule for -java > packages). Ah, never mind, I misunderstood what you meant by "it"; so

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-15 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Aaron, Le 14/10/2022 à 02:05, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : Pierre Gruet writes: I have just pushed some changes. I adopted the -- I believe -- least invasive solution by creating a new package libngs-jni which depends on the shared lib package (not the -dev one), only ships a symlink to the sha

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-13 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Pierre Gruet writes: > I have just pushed some changes. I adopted the -- I believe -- least > invasive solution by creating a new package libngs-jni which depends > on the shared lib package (not the -dev one), only ships a symlink to > the shared lib with full version number, and on which the -j

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-13 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Aaron, Le 12/10/2022 à 04:48, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : Pierre Gruet writes: Indeed, this warning should be overridden, usually I do so and add a pointer to the discussion in https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2018/06/msg00021.html in the comment in the .lintian-overrides file. Got it, t

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Pierre Gruet writes: > Indeed, this warning should be overridden, usually I do so and add a > pointer to the discussion in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2018/06/msg00021.html in the > comment in the .lintian-overrides file. Got it, thanks! > Do you have an idea of the exact way the .so

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-11 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Aaron and Andreas, Le 11/10/2022 à 15:06, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : Andreas Tille writes: I wanted to set you "Owner" of the Debian Med team repository since this is the maximum power. I realised you are owner. So either someone has beaten me and just did so or something is wrong if you ca

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, Am Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:06:28AM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > > I wanted to set you "Owner" of the Debian Med team repository since this > > is the maximum power. I realised you are owner. So either someone has > > beaten me and just did so or something is wrong if you can't do wha

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > I wanted to set you "Owner" of the Debian Med team repository since this > is the maximum power. I realised you are owner. So either someone has > beaten me and just did so or something is wrong if you can't do what you > want to do. OK, thanks. A closer look indicated

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-11 Thread Andreas Tille
[Pierre, please read at the end] Hi Aaron, Am Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:48:58PM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > > > Ah, right, sra-sdk will need to go through NEW too -- the ngs-sdk code > > it absorbed underwent an SONAME bump along the way. (All necessar

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-10 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
"Aaron M. Ucko" writes: > u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > >> Ah, right, sra-sdk will need to go through NEW too -- the ngs-sdk code >> it absorbed underwent an SONAME bump along the way. (All necessary >> ncbi-vdb changes passed NEW a few weeks ago, but ncbi-vdb 3.x is sitting >> in ex

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-10-10 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > Ah, right, sra-sdk will need to go through NEW too -- the ngs-sdk code > it absorbed underwent an SONAME bump along the way. (All necessary > ncbi-vdb changes passed NEW a few weeks ago, but ncbi-vdb 3.x is sitting > in experimental until sra-sdk joins it

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-09-28 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > This would be really helpful since we are approaching the next freeze > with an unpredictable migration time through new queue due to name > change of the library package. Ah, right, sra-sdk will need to go through NEW too -- the ngs-sdk code it absorbed underwent an SON

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-09-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:01:41PM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > Andreas Tille writes: > > > ping about this NCBI suite? > > I've continued to have a lot going on outside Debian, but will try to > find time to get back to it soon. This would be really helpful since we are approaching the next

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-09-28 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > ping about this NCBI suite? I've continued to have a lot going on outside Debian, but will try to find time to get back to it soon. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.m

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-09-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, ping about this NCBI suite? Kind regards Andreas. Am Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:49:23AM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > Andreas Tille writes: > > > I noticed that another upload does not keep the position of the package > > in the new queue but pulls it down at the end again. :-( BTW,

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-08-26 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > I noticed that another upload does not keep the position of the package > in the new queue but pulls it down at the end again. :-( BTW, what is Oops. I've gone ahead with 3.0.0+dfsg2-2 now, then; I'm confident in those changes and don't want to let the position slip much

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-08-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, Am Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:38:39AM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > > I wasn't quite as quick as I'd hoped, but still managed to avoid a > separate NEW cycle. I subsequently discovered the need for some > additional tuneups, which I've pushed but not uploaded because I might > not be ent

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-08-25 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > This would mean another trip through new. I think it would be good to > upload this quickly sinnce the package is currently hanging in new and > ftpmaster can inspect your changed package. I wasn't quite as quick as I'd hoped, but still managed to avoid a separate NEW cy

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-08-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 11:24:02PM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > Andreas Tille writes: > > > CMake Error at test/sharq/CMakeLists.txt:42 (add_dependencies): > > The dependency target "RE2_" of target "test-sharq-parser" does not exist. > > I'll try to take a look soon, but most likely your pa

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-08-07 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > CMake Error at test/sharq/CMakeLists.txt:42 (add_dependencies): > The dependency target "RE2_" of target "test-sharq-parser" does not exist. I'll try to take a look soon, but most likely your patch didn't go quite far enough. Meanwhile, I have made more (local) progres

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-07-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, thanks a lot for your iterative help which enables taking one hurdle after the other. Unfortunately there seem to be many of them. ;-) Am Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:41:18AM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > Andreas Tille writes: > > > -- Could NOT find JNI (missing: JAVA_AWT_LIBRARY JAVA_A

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-07-28 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > -- Could NOT find JNI (missing: JAVA_AWT_LIBRARY JAVA_AWT_INCLUDE_PATH). > > (which is probably caused at the end of file >ngs/ncbi/ngs-jni/CMakeLists.txt ) More likely the find_package(Java ...) call on line 159 of build/env.cmake. At any rate, it looks like CMake m

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, Am Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:29:38PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > No real problem - the package will sit in NEW for some time. I think I > also stumbled upon the line-ending issue and solved it by excluding > .gitattributes from upstream source tarball which makes the issue void > (from

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-07-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, Am Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 02:21:11PM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > Andreas Tille writes: > > > I think ncbi-vdb version 3.0.0 is finished in Git. I'm just uploading it to > > experimental (needs to pass new queue due to the changed binary names). I > > Thanks, but I still have some u

Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-07-27 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > I think ncbi-vdb version 3.0.0 is finished in Git. I'm just uploading it to > experimental (needs to pass new queue due to the changed binary names). I Thanks, but I still have some unpushed changes from some time back. As noted at the time, I went to +dfsg2 to sideste

Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk

2022-07-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, I think ncbi-vdb version 3.0.0 is finished in Git. I'm just uploading it to experimental (needs to pass new queue due to the changed binary names). I tried building sra-sdk 3.0.0 against these packages but here the configure step with cmake fails with -- Found Java: /usr/bin/java (fo