Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas and Liubov, Thank you! That's great news indeed, and its always a pleasure to work with you! Besides, I'll resume work on idba in around ten days, once my mid-semester exams get over. Regards, Pranav On Thu, 27 Feb, 2020, 2:41 PM Liubov Chuprikova, wrote: > Hi Andreas and Pranav, > >

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas and Pranav, That's great news! Congrats, Pranav, on one more bug closed! Regards, Liubov On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 09:47, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > loki smoothly migrated to testing so may be my local install was the > only place where the test failed (for whatever reason).

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi again, loki smoothly migrated to testing so may be my local install was the only place where the test failed (for whatever reason). So thanks for your work on this Andreas. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:02:23AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Pranav, > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 03:14:49P

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Pranav, On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 03:14:49PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote: > > While reading the debian-med email archive from last year, I found some > helpful links from Liubov on this subject, and a few videos you had posted > links to. > Thanks to the both of you for that! You see it makes

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas, On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:39 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Pranav, > > I need to admit that your contributions had a high level and its hard to > believe for me that its your first time contributing to open source. > I'm always happy to see competent students in GSoC. > Thank you :)

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas, I ran loki's tests on my machine in sbuild environment, and I got no errors. As I understand it, the loki.dat file has to exist after "prep" steps. I added an "ls" into the run-unit-test to check this. Also, I turned on the build-time tests that are more or less the same as for the aut

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Pranav, On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 07:30:09PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote: > > You are perfectly welcome. On one hand I see this as my duty as a > > (pontential) GSoC mentor. On the other hand your level of contribution > > shows that you are really dedicated to the task and I'd love to support

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas, On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:57 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Pranav, > > as a general note: On Debian lists it is assumed that people (who do > not say otherwise) are subscribed to the list. Thus in responses of > some mail the poster is usually not CCed. In mutt exists the feature >

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Pranav, as a general note: On Debian lists it is assumed that people (who do not say otherwise) are subscribed to the list. Thus in responses of some mail the poster is usually not CCed. In mutt exists the feature "List-Reply" - no idea about your client. I will follow this policy now and j

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas, Thanks for taking the time out to look into my work. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:54 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Pranav, > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:30:58PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote: > > other day, and I've now added to loki > > as well.

Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Pranav, On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:30:58PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote: > other day, and I've now added to loki > as well. I had a look into loki now (please git pull). Besides minor issues there is one remaining error in the test suite which is stran