Re: Debuild issue

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:54:12AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > > If you have to repackage upstreams tarball again, e.g. removing a pdf file, > then just change the dfsg part to "dfsg0", "dfsg1", etc.. So you will end > up with something like plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz Well, sin

Re: Debuild issue

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Gregory, > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:10:29PM -0800, Gregory Sharp wrote: > > >The source tarball should not contain the Debian revision number. The > > >"-1" in the end is the Debian package version which will be increased > > >if the

Re: Debuild issue

Hi Gregory, On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:10:29PM -0800, Gregory Sharp wrote: > >The source tarball should not contain the Debian revision number.  The > >"-1" in the end is the Debian package version which will be increased > >if there would be a need to change the packaging. > > > >> Should I just

Re: Debuild issue

Dear Andreas, Thank you for your advice. >> I have a plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg-1.orig.tar.gz, but it looks like >> a plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg.orig.tar.gz is wanted.  (See below for details.) > >The source tarball should not contain the Debian revision number.  The >"-1" in the end is the Debian pa

Re: Debuild issue

Hi Gregory, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:25:12PM -0800, Gregory Sharp wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to rebundle a new plastimatch, but ran into a strange issue.  > Even after several hours I can't figure it out. > > I have a plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg-1.orig.tar.gz, but it looks like > a plastimatch_1.5.1

Debuild issue

Hi, I'm trying to rebundle a new plastimatch, but ran into a strange issue.  Even after several hours I can't figure it out. I have a plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg-1.orig.tar.gz, but it looks like a plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg.orig.tar.gz is wanted.  (See below for details.) Should I just rename the .tar