Hi Olivier,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:29:10AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Thanks for your help at driving me for better/cleaner packaging
That's a pleasure. We definitely save time compared if we would need to
do all the packaging in a small team. So we try to involve more people
and enlarg
Thanks for your help at driving me for better/cleaner packaging
Olivier
Le 3/22/11 12:44 AM, Charles Plessy a écrit :
Le Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 03:43:59PM +0100, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
I have created a get-orig-source that strips out the file, and a
patch 'debianpackaging' that updated the bui
Le Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 03:43:59PM +0100, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
>
> I have created a get-orig-source that strips out the file, and a
> patch 'debianpackaging' that updated the build related files to
> remove tests on the file.
Dear Olivier,
thank you very much for all your efforts and your pe
Hi,
I have created a get-orig-source that strips out the file, and a patch
'debianpackaging' that updated the build related files to remove tests
on the file.
Ran in "trunk", it creates a new orig.tar.gz in tarballs (used other
examples in svn)
Olivier
Le 3/21/11 1:15 PM, Andreas Tille a
ok , I gonna update to add a get-orig source to remove file and keep
patch to remove tests on file.
I will let you know
Olivier
Le 3/21/11 1:44 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:19:16PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
this is done in a patch debianpackaging, should it be st
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:19:16PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> this is done in a patch debianpackaging, should it be stripped directly
> via a get-orig-source?
> I do not manage souce myself, I just do the packaging.
Sure. But if the file in the source tarball is non-distributable
regarding
This should be ok now.
I tested installed packages, man pages etc..
Copyright issue is fixed (at least worarounded).
Thanks for your help
Olivier
Le 3/21/11 12:32 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:07:31AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
I just have an issue with my lintian
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:07:31AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> I just have an issue with my lintian override I cannot make work (W:
> libsquizz: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libbioali0 libbioseq0)
> My override is not taken into account. I tried many things but there is
> certainly some
Hi,
I have updated and patched squizz to remove licensed file (used for testing)
I have packages: squizz, libsquizz and libsquizz-dev. I kept libraries
in a single package as it does not really make sense to separate them.
I just have an issue with my lintian override I cannot make work (W:
li
Le Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:39:14AM +0100, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
>
> 1) How did you find license issues ? (manual parse of all files?)
>
> 2) Regarding symbol file, how did you generate it ? (could help for
> further work)
Hi Olivier,
to check for license issues, I usually use commands like “
Hi Charles,
I have a question regarding your work:
1) How did you find license issues ? (manual parse of all files?)
2) Regarding symbol file, how did you generate it ? (could help for
further work)
Thanks
Olivier
Le 3/19/11 7:39 AM, Charles Plessy a écrit :
Le Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:32:0
Le Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:32:05PM +0100, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
>
> I could also create (sub)binary packages with package name libbioseq
> and libbioali, but I don't think it is acceptable to use several
> packages names (not like squizz-xxx). My control file would have
> source package squizz
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:32:05PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> I am splitting squizz in packages squizz (binary), libsquizz and
> libsquizz-dev as you proposed.
>
> I have an "issue" though, the generated libs (libsquizz) by the tool are
> libbioseq and libbioali, not some libs
Hi Andreas,
I am splitting squizz in packages squizz (binary), libsquizz and
libsquizz-dev as you proposed.
I have an "issue" though, the generated libs (libsquizz) by the tool are
libbioseq and libbioali, not some libsquizz-bioseq kind.
This raise a Warn in lintian.
Should I change the "ma
Hi Olivier,
thanks for working on this package. (I actually have the impression
that Travemünde triggered some kind of competition who might package the
highest number of new packages. ;-))
I had a look into the packaging and I think it might work this way but
the existence of the libs leaves so
Hi,
squizz is packaged on SVN and has been tested in my config (and pbuilder
too).
Can someone check it and upload it, if ok ;-)
Thanks
Olivier
Le 3/17/11 8:47 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi Olivier,
thanks for keeping us informed - tasks page will be updated after
next cron run
Andre
Hi Olivier,
thanks for keeping us informed - tasks page will be updated after
next cron run
Andreas.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:56:23PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-med@lists.debian.org
>
> Maintainer: Olivier Sallou
> Language: C
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Maintainer: Olivier Sallou
Language: C
License: GNU v2
Upstream Author: Nicolas Joly
Homepage: ftp://ftp.pasteur.fr/pub/gensoft/projects/squizz/
Description:
Squizz is a sequence/alignment format checker, but it has so
18 matches
Mail list logo
