Re: What category for edfbrowser (Was: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files)

2011-05-27 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andreas, Sorry for the delay on answering your mail. I've been quite busy with non-Debian related stuff. I am aware about Debian Med being part of the "main" archive. I understand my mail was quite badly worded, because I was trying to say some

What category for edfbrowser (Was: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files)

2011-04-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, I just stumbled upon this nearly one year old posting. I have seen that edfbrowser had several updates and is actively maintained. However I wonder whether you might consider joining the Debian Med team anyway. >From your single posting to the list which I answered below I had the feelin

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2010-04-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:38:22PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > I actually wanted to put this version in the svn repo, but then it > turned out that svn-buildpackage and git-buildpackage don't support the > new dpkg-source format (yet?). To be honest I personally do not uses these tools but rat

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2010-04-27 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Andreas! I actually wanted to put this version in the svn repo, but then it turned out that svn-buildpackage and git-buildpackage don't support the new dpkg-source format (yet?). Also I don't really think the package should be optional, and I'm not sure if I feel comfortable allowing uploads

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2010-04-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 04:43:24PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance > > following Debian Med group policy[1]? BTW, the policy is not fully up > > to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository. >

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2009-10-15 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Andreas! You wrote: > Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance > following Debian Med group policy[1]? BTW, the policy is not fully up > to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository. Sure, that's fine with me. If you can add me to the

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2009-10-15 Thread Karsten Hilbert
IMO both practice and tools seem to fit. Karsten On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:09:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Subject: Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical > timeseries > storage files > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) > > Hi Bas, > >

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2009-10-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, sorry for the full quote but I want to keep Debian Med in the queue. Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance following Debian Med group policy[1]? BTW, the policy is not fully up to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository. To th