Hello,
On 16/02/13 21:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:16:55AM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
Ok. I just modified both entries as UNRELEASED (policy are to be respected!)
But forgot to commit! Done now.
I admit I reverted the idea to leave the unreleased
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:16:55AM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
> >>Ok. I just modified both entries as UNRELEASED (policy are to be respected!)
> >
> But forgot to commit! Done now.
I admit I reverted the idea to leave the unreleased version 3.0.3-1
because the changelog was clos
Ok. I just modified both entries as UNRELEASED (policy are to be respected!)
:-)
But forgot to commit! Done now.
No, there is no problem with frequent uploads. Just try to decide what
is in the best interest of your users (which you know way better then
me.)
I suppose then the best would be
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:10:01PM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
> >I've checked that it is just a small file but wanted to make you
> >aware about this.
> I just asked the developer of the itkimage extension about it. I will
> let you know if this is a normal or not (I seemed to remember we need
Thank you Andreas,
Feel free to ignore (you need to use lintian from unstable which
knows the latest standard-version). Ignoring this is perfectly
fine.
Ok
- libcamitk3 binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames (this one is
overriden)
That's OK.
Good.
1) Concerning the first warning: I
Sounds good so far. I have spotted some lintian info which is not
dramatically but I stumbled the first time about it (you need
`lintian -I`)
I: libcamitk3-data: duplicated-compressed-file
usr/share/camitk-3.0/testdata/BigEndianCompressed.img.gz N: N:
The given, apparently compressed, file is sh
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:09:31AM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> About the commit I did yesterday, I wanted to mention two remaining
> lintian's warning (I forgot them in my joy of having something
> operational):
> - camitk source: newer-standards-version 3.9.4 (curre
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:37:53PM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just committed some changes on the svn corresponding to the first
> two points of my plan:
> - rtfm (not finished, as I keep finding new things to read or to re-read)
> - update upstream source tarball
> - generate a
Hello,
About the commit I did yesterday, I wanted to mention two remaining
lintian's warning (I forgot them in my joy of having something operational):
- camitk source: newer-standards-version 3.9.4 (current is 3.9.3)
- libcamitk3 binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames (this one is
override
Hello,
I just committed some changes on the svn corresponding to the first two
points of my plan:
- rtfm (not finished, as I keep finding new things to read or to re-read)
- update upstream source tarball
- generate a separate libqtpropertybrowser package from the source tarball
All was going
10 matches
Mail list logo
