Re: [Insight-users] ITK 3.16 Packages for Ubuntu Karmic Koala (9.10)

2009-11-02 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:50:00AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Steve, > > If you have been reading this thread, what is your point of view ? My preference is to follow upstream. Changing the wrapping breaks existing code, so we don't want to do it lightly. I've just replied to this thre

Re: [Insight-users] ITK 3.16 Packages for Ubuntu Karmic Koala (9.10)

2009-11-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
BTW, I cannot build ITK+CSwig+Tcl8.5 anymore. I'll check if switching to wrapitk work around the compilation issue with Tk_PhotoSetSize within cswig code. cheers On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Steve, > >  If you have been reading this thread, what is your point of vie

Re: [Insight-users] ITK 3.16 Packages for Ubuntu Karmic Koala (9.10)

2009-11-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Steve, If you have been reading this thread, what is your point of view ? Do you think you can move to ITK/WrapITK (this would solve the numpy vs numarray issue as a side effect) ? thanks, 2009/11/2 Gaëtan Lehmann : > > Le 2 nov. 09 à 09:16, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > >> Luis, >> >>  That i