On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
"inofficial" is not commonly used in English today.
Ahh, my fault - David did it correctly and I changed it because
I found inofficial listed higher in a dictionary.
I humbly suggest "Experimental or unofficial".
Feel free to not humbly to sugges
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:07:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:29:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> >
> > >I think I would opt for "experimental Debian package available".
> >
> > That's why I suggested the workaroun
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Or rename the category "Experimental or inofficial". I also think that
Ahh, that sounds very reasonable.
we never will have enough packages in `experimental' to nicely populate
an "Experimental" category.
Yep.
Thanks for the hint
Andreas
Le Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:29:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>
> >I think I would opt for "experimental Debian package available".
>
> That's why I suggested the workaround to mention experimental packages
> as inofficial which in my eyes is a pro
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Steffen Moeller wrote:
There are two ways to do so:
1. Fix your package description and it will be put onto the page
2. Fix debian-med source in SVN
what I meant was that at some meta-level the page could possibly give
the information that you just wrote in your mail.
5 matches
Mail list logo
