Re: I'd like to move Invesalius packaging from SVN to Git (Was: r23899 - in trunk/packages/invesalius/trunk/debian: . source)

2017-08-15 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
e: > Hi Thiago, > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:44:35PM +0000, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > > > Yeah, we released a new version of InVesalius in the last friday. Now I'm > > packaging it. > > > > Git is much better to work then SVN. Y

Re: InVesalius 3.0.1 with VTK6 support

2016-06-30 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
sn't search for this error in the .desktop file. On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:05 PM Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:56 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > >> Hi Thiago, >> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:18:00AM -0300, Thiago Franco

Re: Updated the package to new invesalius version

2015-07-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:10 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:46:46PM -0300, Thiago Franco de Moraes wrote: > > Thanks! I've just seen that InVesalius package was accepted at Unstable. > > :-) > > BTW, in your development you should concentrate on Python3 migrat

Re: InVesalius 3b5

2014-04-28 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> Hi Thiago, >> >> thanks for updating the invesalius package. >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:06

Re: InVesalius 3b5

2014-04-25 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > thanks for updating the invesalius package. > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:06:45PM -0300, Thiago Franco de Moraes wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We released a new version of InVesalius on the last thursday and now I'm

Re: Please upload screenshot of invesalius (and others for sure if you like)

2014-01-31 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:57:21PM +0000, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > > Done! > > :-) > > > A interesting news about the use of InVesalius and Blender. Cicero > Moraes, > > a

Re: Please upload screenshot of invesalius (and others for sure if you like)

2014-01-31 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, Done! A interesting news about the use of InVesalius and Blender. Cicero Moraes, a guy here from Brazil, is working on the reconstruction of Saint Anthony of Padua (or Lisbon) face using InVesalius and Blender. Saint Anthony is very popular here in Brazil, in Portugal and Italy. Here

Re: InVesalius new version and copyright

2013-04-02 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:02:16AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > > ... > > I checked the package and it seems to be lintian free. > > Does this mean I should have a look whether it is ripe

Re: InVesalius new version and copyright

2013-04-02 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 03:10:18PM -0300, Thiago Franco de Moraes wrote: > > We released a new InVesalius version some days ago. I committed the > changes related to packaging this new version. The only question b

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-02-14 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:25:01PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> I created a branch (beta3) where I'm committing and cherry-picking >> some fixes to beta3. After these commits I

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-02-07 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:48:05AM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> sample/sample2.inv3 was created using an old InVesalius version. The >> new InVesalius is not able to open, so this file is useless. It just >>

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-02-07 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:29:53PM -0200, Thiago Franco de Moraes wrote: >> I managed to create the package. I created a new package in debian/control >> and a new file called debian/invesalius-examples.examples. I

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-01-20 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:39:11PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> I updated the debian/watch to match the last invesalius release. I >> have to use "opts=dversionmangle" to m

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-01-13 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
change the shebang from "#!/usr/local/bin/python" to "#!/usr/bin/python". Best regards. On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:25:08PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> I was very busy working in InVesalius source code and

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-01-09 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:43:34PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> > Please also note that `dpkg --compare-versions` does consider 3.0.0.b3-1 >> > larger than 3.0.0-1 - so uscan might fail identifying your real release >> > as a hig

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2012-12-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, > Please also note that `dpkg --compare-versions` does consider 3.0.0.b3-1 > larger than 3.0.0-1 - so uscan might fail identifying your real release > as a higher version than your beta release. I was reading [1] about this issue with version. So I'll need to use something like this a

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2012-12-14 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:40:33PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> I've done and committed that trick with debian/links. I saw I'll need >> create a man to InVesalius because the package adds a s

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2012-12-12 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Andreas, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:47:23AM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> > Please make very sure that the source also contains the *source* of this >> > PDF file (whatever it might be). >> >> Yes.

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2012-12-11 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:14:11PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> InVesalius has a docs and its only file is a pdf file. > > Please make very sure that the source also contains the *

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2012-12-10 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:20:44PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> > You may even make use of `dh_install` syntax instead of the lower >> > level `install` command. >> >&

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2012-12-07 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Thiago Franco Moraes > wrote: >> I have the following question: How can I add a file (Makefile in my >> case) when doing the package? I was thinking in add the Makefile in

Packaging InVesalius

2012-12-07 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi, After the packaging of python-casmoothing I started today the packaging of InVesalius 3. I've already packaged the last version to distribute to our users [1], but this package does not follow the Debian policies. As InVesalius source code [2] does not have a Makefile I created one and put it

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-11-23 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:51:22AM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> >> Done. The bug number is #693963. I CCed debian-med. > > Congratulations, I just sponsored your first Debian

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-11-22 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:57:34AM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> >> Done. I tagged the version 0.1 in github. Ah, To get a tarball that >> matches python-casmoothing- pattern I

Bug#693963: ITP: python-casmoothing -- Context-aware mesh smoothing for biomedical applications

2012-11-22 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Package: wnpp Owner: Thiago Franco de Moraes X-Debbugs-CC: debian-med@lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-casmoothing Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Thiago Franco de Moraes * URL : https://github.com/tfmoraes/python-casmoothing * License

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-11-21 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:25:50PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> > Thanks for your preparation. I downloaded this and tried to build it in >> > a clean chroot. This seemed t

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-11-19 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, I had to go to a workshop ... I could only take a look at this today. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:35:10PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> >> I've just created the first package to

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Thiago Franco de Moraes < totonixs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em 11-10-2012 03:36, Andreas Tille escreveu: > > Hi Thiago, >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:25:35PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> >>> I do not thin

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-10-10 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:19:27PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> > Good to know that. We are planing to put all c/c++ lib we've been >> > developing inside a folder in InVesalius. >> >> I'

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-10-10 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Mathieu Malaterre > wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thiago Franco Moraes >> wrote: >> [...] >>> already packaged in Debian. But now InVesalius is using

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-10-09 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thiago Franco Moraes > wrote: > [...] >> already packaged in Debian. But now InVesalius is using a library I >> developed called Context aware smoothing [1], which is not package in &

Re: InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-10-08 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:39:25PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm one of InVesalius developers. InVesalius is a free software to >> visualize and handle

InVesalius 3 Beta

2012-09-21 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi, I'm one of InVesalius developers. InVesalius is a free software to visualize and handle medical images (RMI and CT), it allows the generation of stl files which can be used for rapid prototyping. InVesalius is developed at CTI (Renato Archer Technology of Information Center), a research instit

Re: Ping (Was: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR))

2011-04-13 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:18:26AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> Sigar is used in InVesalius to get some informations about the system, >> like available memory RAM, to know if it's necessary to resize the >&g

Re: Ping (Was: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR))

2011-04-11 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Michael Hanke wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 12:06:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> after my presentation at Med@Tel [1] I was explixitely asked for >> Invesalius packaging.  Can somebody please give a status update >> about SIGAR as prerequisite.  Is there an

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Ah, I've done some modifications in the copyright and changelog https://github.com/tfmoraes/sigar/tree/debian/debian On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0300,

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> Ah, that was my fault. I was only trying to package the java binding, >> only tests. I just forget to put ant in dependencies. > > OK. > >&g

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:08:54AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> >> I was in touch with Michael Hanke some months ago about sigar >> packaging. Acording to him, these were the problems: >>

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
2010 at 03:27:55PM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 03:46:20PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Andreas Tille >> > wrote: >> > W: libsigar: package-installs-python-pyc >&

Re: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging)

2010-03-29 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Michael Hanke wrote: > Hey, > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 03:46:20PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Andreas Tille >wrote: > > W: libsigar: package-installs-python-pyc > > usr/lib/python2.6

Re: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging)

2010-03-29 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:11:09AM -0300, Tatiana Al-Chueyr wrote: > > Until now, we haven't had advances on SIGAR packaging [1]. > > > > How should we proceed? > > I had a (quick) look at Thiagos packaging[2] and while the package > builds