[RFU] praat 6.0.4-2

In the preparation of version 6.0.4-1, I did a big mistake and forgot to commit something that is crucial for getting Praat working correctly: the package must be built against Pulseaudio, otherwise the sound playback does not work. Please, upload version 6.0.4-2, prepared in Git as in commit

Re: [RFU] praat 6.0.4-1

Just in case nobody did the upload yet, I committed an extra change that prevents unreproducible builds. Please, use commit 0de4609 for uploading the 6.0.4-1 version. Thanks, Rafael * Rafael Laboissiere [2015-11-01 20:11]: I prepared a version 6.0.4-1 of the praat package in Git [commit

[RFU] praat 6.0.4-1

I prepared a version 6.0.4-1 of the praat package in Git [commit d008c2d]. This is an upstream major version bump, with many improvements and bug fixes. Please, upload it to unstable. Thanks, Rafael

[RFU] praat 5.4.4-1

I prepared a new version of the praat package in Git. Please, upload it to unstable. It is an unpstrem version bump. Thanks, Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://

Re: [RFU] praat 5.4.0-1

I prepared a new version of the praat package in Git. Please, upload it to unstable. It is an unpstrem version bump. Thanks, Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Re: [RFU] praat 5.3.86-1

I prepared in Git the Debian package for a new upstream of Praat. Please, upload it to unstable. Thanks, Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/

Re: [RFU] praat 5.3.85-1

I prepared a new version of the praat package in Git. Please, upload it to unstable. It is an unpstrem version bump and also fix problems in debian/copyright. Thanks, Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

Re: Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

* Joost van Baal-Ilić [2013-05-22 00:07]: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:29:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:39:11AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: I forgot to say two things: 1) I reverted my previous changes in Git regarding the linking against the native GSL

Re: Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

quite messy entry in debian/changelog, so I prepared the entry for 5.3.46-1 and committed it to Git. Best, Rafael * Rafael Laboissiere [2013-04-22 22:48]: Hi Andreas, As you probably noticed, I have prepared the praat package in the Git repository for the new upstream release 5.3.46

Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

Hi Andreas, As you probably noticed, I have prepared the praat package in the Git repository for the new upstream release 5.3.46. Since wheezy is almost out of the door, I merged the experimental branch into the master branch. BTW, there was no real need for creating the experimental branch a

Re: Linking Praat against the native GSL library

* Paul Boersma [2013-04-13 22:53]: Op 13 apr. 2013, om 22:24 heeft Rafael Laboissiere het volgende geschreven: It fails, unfortunately: Error: Script assertion fails in line 32 (undefined): abs (fisherQ (invFisherQ (i/1000, df1, df2), 1, 10) - 3/1000) < 1e-11 ; 3 1 100

Re: Linking Praat against the native GSL library

* Paul Boersma [2013-04-13 15:43]: great to see that GSL is getting better. I'll see whether the new version handles the remainder of our tests correctly as well. Or you could test it at once with your GSL library, by inserting Debug… no 29 as the first line of test/fisherQ.praat It fail

Re: Linking Praat against the native GSL library

Just a complement on this issue: I installed an older version of GSL (1.8, available in Debian etch) and I could confirm the bug that you reported: $ ./test -nan Rafael * Rafael Laboissiere [2013-04-12 23:32]: * Rafael Laboissiere [2013-04-12 05:46]: I will have a look at the

Re: Linking Praat against the native GSL library

* Rafael Laboissiere [2013-04-12 05:46]: I will have a look at the specific GSL problem you mentioned. This is what I obtain with the current version (1.15+dfsg.2-2) of the Debian libgsl0 package: $ cat test.c #include #include main () { printf ("

Re: Linking Praat against the native GSL library

Hi Paul, Thank you for your prompt and extensive reply. I fully understand your caution as regards the scientific correctness of Praat's results, even though it would be better, from a system distribution point of view, to avoid embedded libraries. I will have a look at the specific GSL pro

Re: Linking Praat against the native GSL library

Hi Andreas (through the mailing list), You have probably seen the commit e3ede6e as well as my message below. Could you please check my changes to the praat package in the Git repository? Thanks, Rafael * Rafael Laboissiere [2013-04-11 10:24]: [Cc:ing to the Debian-Med group, which is

Linking Praat against the native GSL library

GSL currently in Debian is 1.15). Please, tell me whether you think this could be inappropriate for the Debian/Ubuntu users. All the best, Rafael Description: Link against the external GSL library Author: Rafael Laboissiere Last-Update: 2013-04-10 --- praat-5.3.44.orig/makefile +++ praat-5.

Re: LEG: Optimisation and porting - assembly

* Andreas Tille [2013-04-04 08:44]: Thanks for your analysis. I wonder whether it might be feasible for Praat upstream to integrate the adaptations to the according upstream libraries. If I where the Praat author I would really try to avoid maintaining separate code for common libraries.

Re: LEG: Optimisation and porting - assembly

* Andreas Tille [2013-04-03 09:47]: you might have read about the initiative from Linaro to detect assembly code in Free Software to increase portablility. I checked their list for packages inside Debian Med (which became fairly easy by using the recent not yet published stuff to solve #703

Upload Praat 3.5.38-1

First of all, I wish a happy new year to the members of the Debian Med Project. I just prepared the package for a new upstream release (5.3.38) in the experimental branch of the Git repository. If you have time, please upload it to experimental. Cheers, Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: Upload praat 5.3.35-2

* Andreas Tille [2012-12-13 23:18]: So, do you think the change of d/copyright makes another upload necessary? No problem, we can wait for the next upstream release. @Andreas: I see that in version 5.3.35-1, you put my name and email address in the trailer line. Is this a common practice

Upload praat 5.3.35-2

I committed the changes for the praat package version 3.5.35-2. Please, upload it to experimental. I dropped the patch use-dpkg-buildflags.patch, which seems to be useless. I also updated debian/copyright, what I forgot to do in the previous release. @Andreas: I see that in version 5.3.35-1,

Re: Uploading Praat 3.5.35-1

* Emilien Klein [2012-12-12 13:41]: 2012/12/12 Andreas Tille : OK. For those who care about the Git workflow in our team policy document[1]: Would you consider adding the way the Debian Octave team is handling the experimental branch to this document. (And if you agree in principle but

Re: Uploading Praat 3.5.35-1

* Andreas Tille [2012-12-12 11:43]: I do not think that appending CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS instead of overriding or respecting LDFLAGS is anyhow Debian specific but rather good Makefile practice. I agree. Just one question, since you are the author of the quilt patch use-dpkg-buildflags.patch: wha

Re: Uploading Praat 3.5.35-1

* Andreas Tille [2012-12-12 08:50]: I take the freedom to answer on Debian Med list because your practice to handle experimental branch sounds interesting. [snip] Ok, keep me in Cc, since I am not subscribed to the ML. On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:39:48AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote

Re: [Pkg-exppsy-maintainers] Team maintenance of Praat?

* Andreas Tille [2009-11-24 14:39]: > Raphael, you had a lot of other packages. Any other targets for > Debian Med or Debian Science we might have missed? The huge majority of the packages were co-maintained. From the few ones that I maintained alone, no one besides praat should interest the d

Re: Team maintenance of Praat?

* Andreas Tille [2009-11-24 13:24]: > The package praat is listed as part of the psychology task of Debian > Med[1]. I wonder if it might make sense to put it under group > maintenance of either the Experimental Psychology Maintainers team > (fits probably best) or if there is no interest in the

Re: PSIGNIFIT package for fitting psychometric functions

* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-31 09:13]: > Rafael, you did not answered to the question: How should finally sponsor > the package: > [ ] Rafael [ X ] Andreas -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: PSIGNIFIT package for fitting psychometric functions

* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-30 15:29]: > Hmmm, I'm not sure what Rafaels thought, but I understand him that way > that removing the binary is fine. At least I would definitely vote for > using a stripped down tarball and mention the exact reasons in the > README.Debian. This wil

Re: PSIGNIFIT package for fitting psychometric functions

* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-30 07:58]: > 1. I have noticed that you cleaned up the upstream source from all Matlab > stuff, which is fine because we can not handle these scripts in Debian > because Matlab is commercial. [...] My understanding is that Michael used the

Re: PSIGNIFIT package for fitting psychometric functions

* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-30 07:58]: > 4. Please use > Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1 > in debian/control. There are no changes necessary for your packaging > but it is better to stick to the latest policy version in the control > file. Little nitpicking: