GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
On 09/07/2010 04:18 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:54:48AM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> [KSB] Thank you, Charles. This is is a handy feature that I was not
> aware of!
Debian is cool, isn't it? ;-)
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
On 09/07/2010 08:03 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:40:55PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> The concept of a "single user" GT.M is not meaningful. GT.M is
> inherently multi-user.
Well, one nee
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
On 09/07/2010 07:53 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:40:55PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> Writabilty of files: I prefer for an installed version of GT.M to not
> have *any* writable files, even if root
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
On 09/07/2010 12:59 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear Bhaskar,
here are two short comments about unpacking binary packages and
dependance on
libicu.
Le Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:40:55PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar a écrit :
[KSB] <...s
I am catching up on e-mail and will try to respond to all the issues
thoughtfully discussed by Andreas and Alan in this single response.
Preference for no root owned files in the .deb distribution files: I
have a preference for not including any files owned by root in the .deb
distribution file
Background to the Question
When VistA is packaged and distributed, the package itself would be
installed on the system, in some location, say /abc/def. There may be
clinics PQR and XYZ that each want to run their own instances of VistA.
They will generally share the standard or common routine
:22AM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
> * Perhaps packages should be numbered such as
> fis-gtm_5.4-001A-3+lenny2_amd64.deb where 5.4-001A is the GT.M
> version, 3 is the third package of GT.M V5.4-001A, and it is built
> with the lenny2 toolchain for the amd64
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
On 02/03/2010 02:39 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:30:52PM -0800, Jonathan Tai wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
So the question whether to build as root or not on Alioth is void.
The Debian building tools are using fa
8:10:31AM -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>
> [KSB] I found I needed to rework some of the user scripts in the GT.M
> distribution first, which I will get into the GT.M packages. But it
> appears that creating Debian friendly packages - not just binary packages
> but Debian source p
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
On 11/23/2009 04:24 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
thanks fro your quick reply.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:09:56AM -0800, Jonathan Tai wrote:
> I've been packaging GT.M for Ubuntu for a few months now with the aim of
> makin
Comments below. Look for [KSB2].
Regards
-- Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast.
On 08/13/2009 04:50 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:03:11PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> [KSB] Yes, ACID transactions have been around for a while, and even
> mySQL has th
On 08/13/2009 03:00 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:22:45PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> GT.M is not optimized for health care applications! In fact, although
> it is increasingly used in health care, it is currently used worldwide
> more in banking /
On 08/13/2009 03:05 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:28:24PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> Does "WorldVistA EHR is a repackaged and extended version of the VistA
> health care information system" work for you? Thanks.
If you leave out the "WorldVist
Comments at [KSB3]. Thanks.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast.
On 08/12/2009 06:34 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:33:44PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 02:24 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:17:53AM -
d by some other software product).
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:49:54PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "K.S. Bhaskar"
>
>
> * Package name: WorldVistA EHR
> Version : VOE/ 1.0
this. The features
"Extreme Scalability and Robustness" do not really help any
user who has no idea about GT.M.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:31:07PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "K.S. Bhaskar"
>
Look for [KSB2] comments below. Thanks, Michael.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast.
On 08/12/2009 02:24 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:17:53AM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 02:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009
Thanks for the responses, Andreas. Please look below for [KSB] for
further questions / clarifications. Thanks again.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast.
On 08/12/2009 02:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:52:24PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB
On 08/11/2009 05:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:55:43PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
Things are well defined in Debian: Files will go to /usr (not /usr/local).
Architecture dependant files go to /usr/lib, architecture indepenant files
go to /usr
I manage GT.M (http://fis-gtm.com &
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fis-gtm) and after many years of having
GT.M on GNU/Linux available as FOSS (GPL v2 starting in 2001; AGPL v3
since 2008), I am finally working in creating Debian packages for GT.M.
We have been assigned "gtm" as a package nam
Andreas --
Comments below.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
On Feb 7, 2008 4:09 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>
> > GT.M is bootstrapped. Just like you need a gcc to build a gcc, only the
> > dependency is not as strong. Reme
Andreas --
GT.M is bootstrapped. Just like you need a gcc to build a gcc, only the
dependency is not as strong. Remember that GT.M is both a language and a
database, and so bootstrapping is not an unreasonable requirement.
But, in any case, this is outside my expertise. I will take this up wit
On Thursday, January 9, 2003 at 18:14:18 (GMT+0100), Andreas Tille wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
> > There are people who make a living out of installing and configuring
> > VistA, and they can be found at Hardhats (http://hardhats.org) and its
> > mailing list. Interestingly, VistA has a good d
Comments below.
-- Bhaskar
On , January 9, 2003 at 21:03:43 (GMT-1000), Tim Churches wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 22:36, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Andrew Ho wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone working on the VistA Debian package?
> > > Any progress since July?
> > >
> > >
http
24 matches
Mail list logo
