Re: [RFH] aeonbits-owner and capsule-maven-nextflow

2022-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 08:55:27PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > I see three options: > > 1. Revert mcl to past version >From a user base point of view I do not consider this a good option. > 2. Wait for upstream reaction on ocaml support for mcl -- they said someone > might be interested to

Re: [RFH] aeonbits-owner and capsule-maven-nextflow

2022-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:07:45PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > I am planning to take care of both soon! Thanks. > In passing: what do you think of the current RC bug of pplacer? It would > cause the removal of sepp and tipp which seem to have quite a few users, but > I am not sure of the direc

Re: [RFH] aeonbits-owner and capsule-maven-nextflow

2022-12-22 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: > In passing: what do you think of the current RC bug of pplacer? It would > cause the removal of sepp and tipp which seem to have quite a few users, but > I am not sure of the direction to take to fix it. I did take a look at mcl's oca

Re: [RFH] aeonbits-owner and capsule-maven-nextflow

2022-12-22 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Nilesh and everyone, Le 22/12/2022 à 14:21, Nilesh Patra a écrit : Hi Pierre, all, Recent rebuilds have led to bug reports #1026659 and #1026764 for aeonbits-owner and capsule-maven-nextflow respectively. As you might have guessed, both of them are java packages and I've quite frankly been

[RFH] aeonbits-owner and capsule-maven-nextflow

2022-12-22 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Pierre, all, Recent rebuilds have led to bug reports #1026659 and #1026764 for aeonbits-owner and capsule-maven-nextflow respectively. As you might have guessed, both of them are java packages and I've quite frankly been unable to figure out these on my own so far. Could you please take care