Hi Karsten,
I do not mind, to keep the numbering scheme if it makes sense and
reflects the truth. It just needs do be done in a timely manner. Long
standing open CVEs are not acceptable. The current decision should be
drawn quickly and acted accordingly. I hope I made the consequences to
keep
Hello Flavien,
We have just had this bug report on sight:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016276
My last upload of sight was 15 days ago with no issue. Anyway, if you
have some time to look at it, it will be useful!
Best wishes,
--
Pierre
OpenPGP_signature
Descri
Am Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:06:03PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Unfortunately the package does not build[1] which is probably a gcc
> issue. If someone would volunteer to fix this issue we might be able to
> keep the package. If there is no response in say two weeks we should
> probably remove
Am Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 09:56:05AM +0200 schrieb Andreas (Debian):
> I wonder if there is some decision about the naming scheme. I *really*
> want to get the CVE bugs fixed. Users might consider Debian packages
> useless otherwise.
As far as I remember the "Mumps community" considers each and
e
Hi Aaron,
thanks a lot for your iterative help which enables taking one hurdle
after the other. Unfortunately there seem to be many of them. ;-)
Am Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:41:18AM -0400 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
> > -- Could NOT find JNI (missing: JAVA_AWT_LIBRARY JAVA_A
Hi again,
I wonder if there is some decision about the naming scheme. I *really*
want to get the CVE bugs fixed. Users might consider Debian packages
useless otherwise.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 07:44:13AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Amul,
>
> Am Mon, Jul 11, 202
6 matches
Mail list logo
