On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:29:43AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> And we have debian/TODO for that as well imho.
I never used this, it might be a reasonable place as well. But we are
actually talking about something the person who started tha packaging
does not want "todo" anything any more.
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I don't think so. Perhaps I did not made my idea clear enough. While
> "UNRELEASED" in the changelog is just a binary information (released or
> not) I would like to know the reasons *why* the package is not (yet??)
And we have debian/TODO for that as
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Andreas once took the effort to move my collection of draft
> packages from a past home page of mine over to to Debian Med,
> and funnily enough this has indeed helped me 5 years later :)
:-)
> > In principle we could drop such a f
Hello,
On 08/04/2010 09:41 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:31:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> This said, other people may be intersted in the draft packages, or even
>> volunteer to finish them, so I wonder how much it would make sense to share
>> them in a places s
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:31:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> This said, other people may be intersted in the draft packages, or even
> volunteer to finish them, so I wonder how much it would make sense to share
> them in a places such as ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/drafts or
> svn://sv
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 06:08:43PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> Andreas, I took your name off the addressee list to avoid duplication.
Thanks.
> [KSB] I agree that we should target Unstable first. Note that the
> bootstrap requires a release of GT.M, not the current release of GT.M
> (agai
6 matches
Mail list logo
