Support for insecure applications

Hello, I notice that the quality of our packages can vary significantly. Some get frequent security updates, while with others the author appears to be confused just what an SQL injection attack is and how to prevent it. Not going to name names here, because they have done a wonderful job in deve

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

Hi Robert, Am Samstag, den 06.02.2021, 19:46 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: [...] > Hi, Markus: > > I'm OK with both of these plans. > > For the proposed 1.9.6 buster update, can you send me git commits based > against > https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/unbound/-/tree/branches/1.9.0-2_deb10 > ?

Re: Support for insecure applications

Hi, On Feb/12/2021, Brian May wrote: [...] If this is off-topic in the list feel free to answer to me only, redirect to another mailing list and apologies for the noise. > But I am not sure that treating all software as equal, when it obviously > isn't, is a good thing for our users. > Yes,

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Am Samstag, den 06.02.2021, 19:46 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > [...] > > Hi, Markus: > > > > I'm OK with both of these plans. > > > > For the proposed 1.9.6 buster update, can you send me git commits based > > against > > https://salsa.debian.org/dns-te

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

Hi Robert, [just small comment below] On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:20:01PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Markus Koschany wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > Am Samstag, den 06.02.2021, 19:46 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > > [...] > > > Hi, Markus: > > > > > > I'm OK with both of these plans. > > > >