On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Therefore, would it make sense to add a Linux 4.9 backport to the
> regular jessie and jessie-security suites?
Yes, I think so. It's also interesting to keep a security-supported
kernel once we are past the usual 5 years of LTS (aka Extended LTS).
Since
On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 15:44 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Therefore, would it make sense to add a Linux 4.9 backport to the
> > regular jessie and jessie-security suites?
>
> Yes, I think so. It's also interesting to keep a security-supported
> kerne
On 2018-04-22 04:20 PM, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> El 19/04/18 a las 18:07, Gabriel Filion escribió:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've run a test on our setup here after getting a poke from Antoine.
>>
>> I'm not sure that the test is actually conclusive of anything though..
>> basically, it still works for us b