Re: nagios3 spurious backport?

2016-12-18 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hi Antoine, Am 16.12.2016 um 15:15 schrieb Antoine Beaupré: > I am looking at recent nagios3 vulnerabilities and I can't make sense of > this: > > nagios3 (3.4.1-3+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low > > [...] > > -- Jonas Meurer Fri, 01 Nov 2013 14:32:18 +0100 > > https://tracker.debian.org/media/

Re: nagios3 spurious backport?

2016-12-18 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2016-12-18 10:05:48, Jonas Meurer wrote: > I see that the current situation with a higher nagios3 version in > backports than in wheezy-security is not very nice. I'll ping the > backports ftpmasters and ask for removal of nagios3 from wheezy-backports. Actually, after talking with an ftpmaster

Re: unrealize mechanism in 9pfs

2016-12-18 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Guido, > We don't have virtfs-proxy-helper in wheezy so I think we don't need > support the "proxy" case. > > As for "handle" did you check that it works in Wheezy including unplug? > If so please let me know and we can have a closer look. > > I've only used "local" so far which does not seem

Wheezy update of dcmtk?

2016-12-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of dcmtk: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8979 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined

Re: unrealize mechanism in 9pfs

2016-12-18 Thread Guido Günther
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 09:55:55PM +0100, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > Hi Guido, > > > We don't have virtfs-proxy-helper in wheezy so I think we don't need > > support the "proxy" case. > > > > As for "handle" did you check that it works in Wheezy including unplug? > > If so please let me know and we c

Re: Wheezy update of dcmtk?

2016-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Markus, thanks for your work on LTS which I consider quite important. On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:47:05PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hello dear maintainer(s), > > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > currently open in the Wheezy version of dcmtk: > https:/

using existing workflows?

2016-12-18 Thread Antoine Beaupré
In working with the ImageMagick package, I noticed that the maintainer uses gitpkg's debian/source/git-patches system to factor in upstream patches in Debian. We haven't used this so far in the wheezy upload so I kept working that way, especially since i'm not very familiar with that system. I do w

imagemagick security update ready for testing

2016-12-18 Thread Antoine Beaupré
TL;DR: please test and review: https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/wheezy-lts diff -Nru imagemagick-6.7.7.10/debian/changelog imagemagick-6.7.7.10/debian/changelog --- imagemagick-6.7.7.10/debian/changelog 2016-12-11 00:57:24.0 -0500 +++ imagemagick-6.7.7.10/debian/changelog 2016-12

Re: phpmyadmin / CVE-2016-9861 / PMASA-2016-66

2016-12-18 Thread Brian May
Antoine Beaupré writes: >> +--- a/url.php >> b/url.php >> ++// JavaScript redirection is necessary. Because if header() is used >> ++// then web browser sometimes does not change the HTTP_REFERER >> ++// field and so with old URL as Referer, token also goes to >> ++// exte

Re: phpmyadmin / CVE-2016-9861 / PMASA-2016-66

2016-12-18 Thread Brian May
Brian May writes: > I am still a bit unclear in the CVE-2016-4412 / PMASA-2016-57 > vulnerability. Ok, so lets say the vulnerability is in the HTTP_REFERER > having the token. Curiously while I can reproduce this in Firefox, I can't under Chrome, as it doesn't seem to provide the Referer header

Re: phpmyadmin / CVE-2016-9861 / PMASA-2016-66

2016-12-18 Thread Brian May
Brian May writes: > Curiously while I can reproduce this in Firefox, I can't under Chrome, > as it doesn't seem to provide the Referer header in this situation. It looks like replacing the HTTP header with a block of JavaScript code really does hide the Referer header in Firefox ESR version 45.5

Re: Wheezy update of dcmtk?

2016-12-18 Thread Gert Wollny
Hello Markus,  Am Sonntag, den 18.12.2016, 23:46 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Markus, > > thanks for your work on LTS which I consider quite important. > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:47:05PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > > Hello dear maintainer(s), > > > > the Debian LTS team would