On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:52:29PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/08/16 23:02, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:50:28PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:32:14PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:04:47AM +020
Dear maintainer, dear LTS team,
Am 06.08.2016 um 15:59 schrieb Jonas Meurer:
> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Wheezy version of mupdf:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-6525
> [...]
>
> PS: I already started working
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
> I too think I would be good to support Firefox & Icedove until Wheezy
> goes EOL. Wd could backport gcc 4.8 from Jessie with only C/C++ enabled.
And obviously, we make no change to gcc-defaults.
Shall we mark gcc-4.8 as unsupported in wheezy, explaining
Hi Andreas
It looks like you have managed without the context. I'm sorry that I was a
little too brief.
First thank you a lot for confirming that gnutls do not use nettle in
wheezy. This is very good to know as I can safely patch nettle without
considering gnutls usage of nettle. Thanks! It saves
Hi
Yes I think it is a good idea to mark it as unsupported as you describe.
// Ola
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Aug 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
> > I too think I would be good to support Firefox & Icedove until Wheezy
> > goes EOL. Wd could backport gcc 4
On 07/08/16 22:17, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Aug 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
>> I too think I would be good to support Firefox & Icedove until Wheezy
>> goes EOL. Wd could backport gcc 4.8 from Jessie with only C/C++ enabled.
>
> And obviously, we make no change to gcc-defaults.
>
> Shal
