Hello Bastian,
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:13:01AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > In my tests this backport works with live migration. Can someone else
> > > give it a try?
> > > https://github.com/creda
Thanks for looking.
This is a server that's was running Squeeze, now Wheezy. I saw the
warnings :
> > insserv: warning: script 'K02klogd' missing LSB tags and overrides
> > insserv: warning: script 'K04sysklogd' missing LSB tags and overrides
> > insserv: warning: script 'sysklogd' missing LSB ta
On 2016-07-22 10:57, Alastair Sherringham wrote:
I can look at editing the various scripts etc. and seeing if I can fix
them up better. I don't want things to be fragile and cause updates to
fail. Maybe I'll look to upgrade the server to stable.
The error message states that the problem is due
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> I won't claim the update right now but I would suggest that whoever does
> this, also takes this opportunity to rebase the package on top of 1.4.22.
>
> We got the ack from release team to rebase jessie on latest 1.7.x (see
> #807654) and it makes sense to rebase wheezy
Bastian Blank writes:
> Did you get the chance to look at this source?
I think I need to see Debian sources to look at...
Actually I suspect you are not getting emails from me for some reason,
because you haven't responded to any of my recent emails to you. They do
seem to be getting to the fai
Brian May writes:
> seem to be getting to the failing list however.
s/failing list/mailing list/
--
Brian May
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Brian May wrote:
> > We got the ack from release team to rebase jessie on latest 1.7.x (see
> > #807654) and it makes sense to rebase wheezy on latest 1.4.x (in
> > particular since 1.4.x was a LTS version).
>
> I am out of time for this month, however should be able to l
* Lucas Kanashiro [160721 15:24]:
> Some hours ago upstream accepted a pull request that fix this flaw in
> version 3.4.x [0], which allows one to fix it in stable. Could we work
> with that patch for version 3.1 (version in oldstable)?
They did; I'd still suggest waiting until it's official.
Ch
Thanks Jan. If I upgrade to stable, I think I'd do a clean install and
try and avoind this type of cruft building up and causing issues down
the line. I'll need to do some minor testing/planning before though.
Cheers, Alastair
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On 2016-07
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Alastair Sherringham wrote:
> Thanks Jan. If I upgrade to stable, I think I'd do a clean install and
> try and avoind this type of cruft building up and causing issues down
> the line. I'll need to do some minor testing/planning before though.
>
You could
On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 22:37 +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On 2016-07-21 21:13, Alastair Sherringham wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi!
>
> > I saw that Apache2 had a Wheezy LTS update today and did the usual :
> >
> > apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
> >
> > However, this gave me an error, and i
Hello Chris,
2016-07-21 23:52 GMT+02:00 Chris Lamb :
> Hello dear maintainer(s),
>
> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Wheezy version of uclibc:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-6264
>
> (Note that this affects the arm
Hello dear maintainer(s),
the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of mysql-5.5:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-3477
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-3521
https://security-tracker.debian.org/t
On 07/22/2016 09:00 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> They did; I'd still suggest waiting until it's official.
>
I guess it is an official solution (for old version that upstream still
maintains it) because upstream itself accepted it. But ok, let's wait
they merge it into master branch and re
Hi,
On 07/22/2016 08:15 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Brian May wrote:
>>> We got the ack from release team to rebase jessie on latest 1.7.x (see
>>> #807654) and it makes sense to rebase wheezy on latest 1.4.x (in
>>> particular since 1.4.x was a LTS version).
>> I am
On 07/22/2016 03:43 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> I can try to help to rebase wheezy on latest 1.4.x, are you talking
> about debian/wheezy or debian/wheezy-security branch?
>
My bad, I checked out the repo and I saw that the mentioned branch is
debian/wheezy :)
--
Lucas Kanashiro
8ED6 C3F8 BAC
16 matches
Mail list logo
