Am 28.02.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Sonntag, 28. Februar 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I have updated https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using to prepare for the
>> switch to Wheezy LTS. What do you think about sending an EOL
>> announcement to debian-lts-announce on March
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Another package which needs to be sorted out is the support for
> Java. wheezy has both openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 (jessie has only
> -7 and stretch will also only have one version).
I asked our current sponsors about OpenJDK 6 and none asked
us to keep
Am 29.02.2016 um 15:17 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Another package which needs to be sorted out is the support for
>> Java. wheezy has both openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 (jessie has only
>> -7 and stretch will also only have one version).
>
> I asked our c
Hi all,
as of today, the Debian squeeze LTS support will cease and squeeze
will finally enter the archived archives of Debian.
.oO( /me gets out his handkerchief ...)
As (paid) LTS contributor you may wonder what to do next, esp. until
the official Debian wheezy LTS support period starts o
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Matthias Klose, the OpenJDK maintainer, stated that he intends to
> support OpenJDK 6 until Ubuntu 12.04 reaches EOL in April 2017 [1] and I
> think it should be feasible to mirror this approach for Wheezy LTS
> provided everyone agrees to keep OpenJDK
Hi Markus,
On 29-02-16 12:35, Markus Koschany wrote:
> We recommend that you upgrade your systems to Debian 7 "Wheezy".
/me wonders, do we really recommend that? I would say we recommend our
users to upgrade to the current stable (via Wheezy), no? And wheezy-lts
is there for those that can't or w
On 29-02-16 12:35, Markus Koschany wrote:
We recommend that you upgrade your systems to Debian 7 "Wheezy".
On 29.02.16 19:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
/me wonders, do we really recommend that? I would say we recommend our
users to upgrade to the current stable (via Wheezy), no? And wheezy-lts
is the
Hi Markus,
On 29-02-16 20:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> you only can upgrade to wheezy directly. upgrade accross versions is not
> supported.
I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
wheezy.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2016-02-29 20:27, Paul Gevers wrote:
I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
wheezy.
I think that (what you wrote ealier) would be a sensible recommendation
to make.
We're only keeping Wheezy around for system setups that were established
while Wheezy was s
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:33:43PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: aptdaemon
> Version: 1.1.1-4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream
>
> Hi,
>
> the following vulnerability was published for aptdaemon, which AFICS
> as well affects Debian.
>
> CVE-2015-1323[0]:
> informat
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:25:46PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> For this, we can run bin/lts-needs-forward-port.py from the secure-testing
> repo and see what issues we fixed in squeeze and port those fixes to the
> package version in wheezy-security. Package updates must be coordinated with
>
Am 29.02.2016 um 20:27 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On 29-02-16 20:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> you only can upgrade to wheezy directly. upgrade accross versions is not
>> supported.
>
> I know, but that is not what I meant. I meant (and wrote), upgrade via
> wheezy.
Hi Paul,
t
Hi Markus,
On 29-02-16 21:56, Markus Koschany wrote:
> If it helps I could remove the "Debian 7 Wheezy" part and write
> "we recommend that you upgrade your systems".
That fully resolves the issue I was having with the text.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
I have just looked at what it needs to fix CVE-2014-8350 for smarty3
[1]. Unfortunately, the fix [2] from between 3.1.20 and 3.1.21 is not
trivial to backport to wheezy's 3.1.10 version.
The packages that depend on smarty3 in Debian wheezy are these:
o gosa + its plugins
o slba
Hi Guido,
On Mo 29 Feb 2016 21:54:11 CET, Guido Günther wrote:
* prepare a fixed package
* test the package
* send a .debdiff to t...@security.debian.org
* wait for feedback and ideally permission to upload to wheezy-security
That's what I'm doing at the moment (sending the debdiff t
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:15:28AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
[..snip..]
> >>Issues that are unfixed in wheezy but fixed in squeeze:
> >>* aptdaemon-> CVE-2015-1323
> >>* cakephp -> TEMP-000-698CF7
> >>* dhcpcd -> CVE-2012-6698 CVE-2012-6699 CVE-2012-6700
16 matches
Mail list logo
