Hi Adam,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the
> original got eaten due to a misconfiguration on my side - please only
> reply to this copy]
>
> Hi,
>
> As I understand it, the plan is for wheezy-lts t
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 23:37 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On 2016-02-20 20:46, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
>
> > Probably it would be enough to do the following: at first to update as
> > much as possible with the actual "squeeze-lts" entry, following by
> > changing all "squeeze-lts" and "squeeze" e
On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 18:42 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > If so then we need to consider how the transition works in the short
> > term. For example, the final point release of oldstable occurs after
> > security
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:42:20PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > [apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the
> > original got eaten due to a misconfiguration on my side - please only
> > reply to
Hi Mortiz,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:28:48PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:42:20PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > [apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the
>
