Hi,
I just ran "./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 3w --exclude
linux linux-4.9" and no changes were made and then I tried with 2w and
still the same result. Yay!
Just with 1w it would unclaim some packages :) (But I don't think
packages should be unclaimed after a week.)
--
cheers,
Hi Mike,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:44:31AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > I've decided *not* to unclaim salt from Mike now but rather ask him to
> > either unclaim it himself or add a note about the current status of the
> > DLA. Mike?
> First of all, I am totally off-schedule with LTS work. I am
Hi Holger,
On Mo 26 Nov 2018 21:42:15 CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
so I just ran "./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 3w" again and
it would unclaim src:salt from Mike Gabriel, as Mike has claimed it more
than 3 weeks ago and has not stated anything in a note in
data/dla-needed.txt.
I've
On 2018-11-26 21:20:14, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Did you try "--exclude linux linux 4.9"? That should work.
>
> doh, it does. Thanks! (Though I think thats somewhat unusual... but meh.)
that's the way all python-argparsed-based comm
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Did you try "--exclude linux linux 4.9"? That should work.
doh, it does. Thanks! (Though I think thats somewhat unusual... but meh.)
> > (the diff is +linux-4.9 instead of twice +linux)
> oops. fixed.
great, thank you!
--
chee
On 2018-11-26 20:48:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:06:43AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> $ ./bin/review-update-needed --exclude linux linux-4.9 --lts --unclaim 3w
>> [...]
>> Editing file to unclaim: salt
>>
>> I've pushed that, I hope it works for you.
>
> this indeed wo
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:06:43AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> $ ./bin/review-update-needed --exclude linux linux-4.9 --lts --unclaim 3w
> [...]
> Editing file to unclaim: salt
>
> I've pushed that, I hope it works for you.
this indeed works, however I didnt find a way to ignore both linux an
Hi,
so I just ran "./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 3w" again and
it would unclaim src:salt from Mike Gabriel, as Mike has claimed it more
than 3 weeks ago and has not stated anything in a note in
data/dla-needed.txt.
I've decided *not* to unclaim salt from Mike now but rather ask him t
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:06:43AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > commandline param with a list of (src) packages to ignore.
> Okay, I added a --exclude param. Example without:
[...]
> With:
> $ ./bin/review-update-needed --exclude linux linux-4.9 --lts --unclaim
[...]
> I've pushed that, I hope
On 2018-11-22 21:00:15, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:54:16AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> Right. That's the one I had in mind as well. :)
>
> :)
>
>> So how *do* we make that "whitelist"? Commandline param? And what will
>> it list? Packages? People? Package/people combinat
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:54:16AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Right. That's the one I had in mind as well. :)
:)
> So how *do* we make that "whitelist"? Commandline param? And what will
> it list? Packages? People? Package/people combination?
commandline param with a list of (src) packages
On 2018-11-20 16:17:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I ran it asking it to unclaim packages which didnt see activity in
> dla-needed.txt for more than 3 weeks. These are the results from running
> ./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 1814400
[...]
> -linux (Ben Hutchings)
> +linux
> a
Hi,
El 20/11/18 a las 16:17, Holger Levsen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:50:16PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > Automatic unclaimer
> > ---
> >
> > After an internal discussion about work procedures, a friend pointed me
> > at the [don't lick the cookie][6] ar
Hi Hugo,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:46:21PM +0100, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> > -libav (Hugo Lefeuvre)
> > +libav
> > AFAICS this is a legit unclaim. Hugo, would you mind to unclaim this?
> I don't mind. This is probably the best thing to do.
ok, done, thanks. And: feel free to reclaim this package a
Hi Holger,
> So I ran it asking it to unclaim packages which didnt see activity in
> dla-needed.txt for more than 3 weeks. These are the results from running
> ./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 1814400
>
> -libav (Hugo Lefeuvre)
> +libav
> last NOTE: 20180529: Just contacted some of the
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:50:16PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Automatic unclaimer
> ---
>
> After an internal discussion about work procedures, a friend pointed me
> at the [don't lick the cookie][6] article which I found really
> interesting. The basic idea is that our p
16 matches
Mail list logo
