Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-02-03 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 03:28:09PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > So, I'd like to play the ball back to Noah. Do you think, that applying the > security patches is sufficient for spamassassin in stretch/buster? Or have > their been so many other fixes(TM) that justify an upstream backport to > jessie

Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-02-01 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Salvatore, hi Noah, On Sa 01 Feb 2020 14:01:36 CET, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Mike, On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:01:05PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi Ola, Noah, On Fr 31 Jan 2020 20:32:01 CET, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > Spamassassin (and a few other packages) are handled a littl

Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-02-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Mike, On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:01:05PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi Ola, Noah, > > On Fr 31 Jan 2020 20:32:01 CET, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Spamassassin (and a few other packages) are handled a little differently > > compared to most packages in Debian. > > > > I'd advise

Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-01-31 Thread Mike Gabriel
HI Matus, On Fr 31 Jan 2020 17:16:53 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 31.01.20 14:31, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi Noah, dear LTS contributors, Helo guys, I am about to look into CVE-2020-1930 and CVE-2020-1931 reported against spamassassin. The issues have been fixed in 3.4.4~rc1 FYI

Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-01-31 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Ola, Noah, On Fr 31 Jan 2020 20:32:01 CET, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi Spamassassin (and a few other packages) are handled a little differently compared to most packages in Debian. I'd advise that we go for the latest release. The only reason I see why we would not, would be if we introduce s

Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-01-31 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Spamassassin (and a few other packages) are handled a little differently compared to most packages in Debian. I'd advise that we go for the latest release. The only reason I see why we would not, would be if we introduce some major backwards compatibility issue. // Ola On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at

Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-01-31 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 05:16:53PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > and as spamassassin has been upstream version bumped in Debian jessie > > LTS before, I am asking for your opinion, if you'd rather recommend > > cherry-picking the fixes (which I haven't been able to identify yet in > > up

Re: spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-01-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 31.01.20 14:31, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi Noah, dear LTS contributors, Helo guys, I am about to look into CVE-2020-1930 and CVE-2020-1931 reported against spamassassin. The issues have been fixed in 3.4.4~rc1 FYI, 3.4.4 was released two days ago... and as spamassassin has been upstream

spamassassin security update in Debian jessie LTS

2020-01-31 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Noah, dear LTS contributors, I am about to look into CVE-2020-1930 and CVE-2020-1931 reported against spamassassin. The issues have been fixed in 3.4.4~rc1 and as spamassassin has been upstream version bumped in Debian jessie LTS before, I am asking for your opinion, if you'd rather re