Sorry for bringing this again, but...
On 08.10.14 13:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Those are all the same source package. And, no, they weren't missed.
The openjdk-6 updates were unfortunately not able to be included,
as mentioned in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2014/msg6.html
On 2014-10-08 17:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-10-08 17:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The real question is "if there are different packages in squeeze and
squeeze-proposed-updates, to which one are security patches applied"
and
[...]
d
Hi,
On 2014-10-08 17:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The real question is "if there are different packages in squeeze and
squeeze-proposed-updates, to which one are security patches applied"
and
[...]
do you think there will be another squeeze poi
Hi Adam,
On Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The real question is "if there are different packages in squeeze and
> squeeze-proposed-updates, to which one are security patches applied" and
> the obvious answer is squeeze-proposed-updates, as that's what will
> become squeeze at
On 2014-10-08 15:07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
Are they still needed?
Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or
squeeze-updates?
That question doesn't make sense. squeeze-updates is a strict subset
of squeeze (technically squeeze+
What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
Are they still needed?
Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?
That question doesn't make sense. squeeze-updates is a strict
subset of squeeze (technically squeeze+o-p-u, until a point
release). There are never packa
On 2014-10-08 12:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2014-10-04 11:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
Are they still needed?
Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?
On 04.10.14 12:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That ques
On 08.10.14 13:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there still are versions in security that are lower in main, were they
missed
Missed this: Were they missed during last squeeze point release?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive
On 2014-10-04 11:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
Are they still needed?
Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?
On 04.10.14 12:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That question doesn't make sense. squeeze-updates is a strict
Hi,
On Samstag, 4. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
> Are they still needed?
No.
> Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?
No.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
On 2014-10-04 11:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
Are they still needed?
Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?
That question doesn't make sense. squeeze-updates is a strict subset of
squeeze (technically squeeze+o
On Dienstag, 17. Juni 2014, Evgeni Golov wrote:
No, please *extend* the list. Not replace it.
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using
If you remove squeeze and/or squeeze security, dependencies will become
unresolvable.
On 03.10.14 15:42, Holger Levsen wrote:
squeeze-security isn't needed, the last
Hi,
On Samstag, 4. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >btw, installing the debian-security-support package would also have told
> >you that these packages are not supported anymore. :-)
> I do have that one. well unfortunately it's not in wheezy yet.
there is a backport in wheezy-backp
>On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> there are still packages that seem to be part of security updates, like
>> bugzilla3 and openswan
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openswan
On 03.10.14 16:48, Holger Levsen wrote:
oh, you found a bug in the archive: opens
Hi,
On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> there are still packages that seem to be part of security updates, like
> >> bugzilla3 and openswan
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openswan
oh, you foun
On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there are still packages that seem to be part of security updates, like
bugzilla3 and openswan
On 03.10.14 16:17, Holger Levsen wrote:
I don't see these source packages in squeeze at all, where do you see them?
https://packages.debia
Hi,
On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> there are still packages that seem to be part of security updates, like
> bugzilla3 and openswan
I don't see these source packages in squeeze at all, where do you see them?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Thi
On Dienstag, 17. Juni 2014, Evgeni Golov wrote:
No, please *extend* the list. Not replace it.
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using
If you remove squeeze and/or squeeze security, dependencies will become
unresolvable.
On 03.10.14 15:42, Holger Levsen wrote:
squeeze-security isn't needed, the last
Hi,
On Dienstag, 17. Juni 2014, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> No, please *extend* the list. Not replace it.
> https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using
>
> If you remove squeeze and/or squeeze security, dependencies will become
> unresolvable.
squeeze-security isn't needed, the last point release has happened a
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 03:08:51PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 16/06/14 22:00, Matt Palmer wrote:
> > Hi Jelle,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> >> So the only squeeze source I use is: deb
> >> http:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/06/14 22:00, Matt Palmer wrote:
> Hi Jelle,
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>> So the only squeeze source I use is: deb
>> http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main
>>
>> # apt-show-versions | fgrep
Hi Jelle,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> So the only squeeze source I use is:
> deb http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main
>
> # apt-show-versions | fgrep /oldstable
> linux-image-2.6.32-5-486/oldstable uptodate 2.6.32-48squeeze6
>
> What should I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody,
What is going to happen for the linux-image-486 and
linux-image-2.6.32-5-486 packages.
My systems are Debian wheezy but still use the 2.6 kernel because the
3.x kernel breaks my networking with lacp bonding, vlans, bridges and
kvm vi
23 matches
Mail list logo
