On 22/01/2020 07:29, Brian May wrote:
> Brian May writes:
>
>> commit 7cba800a84730c9c5843acdd775e42b8c1438edf (HEAD)
>> Author: Alexander Larsson
>> Date: Mon Jun 1 10:02:47 2015 +0200
>
> This patch decreases the number of errors from 1 to 52.
Thanks for the investigation Brian. However af
Brian May writes:
> Here is a better stack trace (previous version was picking up system
> version of glib):
Here is an even better version of the even better version of the stack
trace that is actually useful (disabled compile time optimisation)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x772cbd08 in _g_log_abort
Here is a better stack trace (previous version was picking up system
version of glib):
(jessie-amd64-default)brian@silverfish:~/debian/lts/packages/glib2.0/glib$
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD/gio/.libs:$PWD/glib/.libs gdb
gio/tests/.libs/network-monitor
GNU gdb (Debian 7.7.1+dfsg-5) 7.7.1
Copyrigh
Brian May writes:
> commit 7cba800a84730c9c5843acdd775e42b8c1438edf (HEAD)
> Author: Alexander Larsson
> Date: Mon Jun 1 10:02:47 2015 +0200
This patch decreases the number of errors from 1 to 52.
(jessie-amd64-default)brian@silverfish:~/debian/lts/packages/glib2.0/glib$
gio/tests/network-
Brian May writes:
> With the 2nd patch, hangs, I pushed Ctrl-C to abort:
>
> (jessie-amd64-sbuild)brian@silverfish:/$
> /build/glib2.0-sBwZ3c/glib2.0-2.42.1/debian/build/deb/gio/tests/.libs/lt-network-monitor
> -k --tap
> # random seed: R02Sfd80eb1bd64b09d0b63ad8bcdfd117d2
> # Start of network
Without the patch:
(jessie-amd64-sbuild)brian@silverfish:/build/glib2.0-0E5btb/glib2.0-2.42.1$
/build/glib2.0-0E5btb/glib2.0-2.42.1/debian/build/deb/gio/tests/.libs/lt-network-monitor
-k --tap
# random seed: R02Sd9f3f21d68a58e8c21843edb3e297722
# Start of network-monitor tests
ok 1 /network-moni
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> Yes, that's the failing test I mentioned in my email. Building without the
> patches works for me. I am still looking at whether upgrading ibus is worth it
> due to the regression risk.
It looks like the 2nd patch that is doing this. Just the 1st patch is
fine.
On 07/01/2020 07:36, Brian May wrote:
> Brian May writes:
>
>> My build is still running the tests, but I don't expect any problems as
>> the test was getting skipped anyway...
>
> Tests seem to be hanging, on the next test after:
>
> PASS: network-address 37 /gresolver/resolve-address/0
> PASS
Brian May writes:
> My build is still running the tests, but I don't expect any problems as
> the test was getting skipped anyway...
Tests seem to be hanging, on the next test after:
PASS: network-address 37 /gresolver/resolve-address/0
PASS: network-address 38 /gresolver/resolve-address/1
PASS
Brian May writes:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
>
>> I have been looking at this, but building glib with only the two fix commits
>> (not the tests one) makes the build hang on the network-monitor tests. I
>> haven't
>> investigated much yet, but I wonder if it may be an issue with my local
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> I have been looking at this, but building glib with only the two fix commits
> (not the tests one) makes the build hang on the network-monitor tests. I
> haven't
> investigated much yet, but I wonder if it may be an issue with my local
> configuration. Did you gl
On 13/12/2019 05:41, Brian May wrote:
> Brian May writes:
>
>> Apparently the fix for ibus creates a regression in glibc that must get
>> fixed also:
>>
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/1176
>>
>> However this patch patches GIO in glibc, and it looks like glibc in
>> Jessie (
Brian May writes:
> Apparently the fix for ibus creates a regression in glibc that must get
> fixed also:
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/1176
>
> However this patch patches GIO in glibc, and it looks like glibc in
> Jessie (2.19-18+deb8u10) doesn't have this directory. Or
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> I think you might want s/glibc/glib/g?
Odd. I am sure I read (and wrote) glibc everywhere. But now I see glib,
which actually makes more sense. Did somebody just change the universe
when I wasn't looking? :-)
Disregard everything I said in that email, will make sure
On 2019-12-10 06:47, Brian May wrote:
Apparently the fix for ibus creates a regression in glibc that must get
fixed also:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/1176
However this patch patches GIO in glibc, and it looks like glibc in
Jessie (2.19-18+deb8u10) doesn't have this direct
Apparently the fix for ibus creates a regression in glibc that must get
fixed also:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/1176
However this patch patches GIO in glibc, and it looks like glibc in
Jessie (2.19-18+deb8u10) doesn't have this directory. Or anything
related to GIO that I c
16 matches
Mail list logo
