Hi, sorry for the delay. Gmail filed this one into spam :-(
Unfortunately, I don't have access to that environment anymore to confirm.
I'll pass this on to the folks that do so hopefully they can.
My recollection from this issue was that I'd tested it against different
package versions and the 40
Control: fixed 858373 2.2.22-13+deb7u7
Control: tags 858373 +pending +patch
On 2017-07-21 09:44:38, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> TL;DR: New proposed package (deb7u11) doesn't actually show a new
> regression, please test:
>
> https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/wheezy-lts/apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u
TL;DR: New proposed package (deb7u11) doesn't actually show a new
regression, please test:
https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/wheezy-lts/apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u11_amd64.changes
In particular, Brian Kroth: are you *sure* you had that ErrorDocument
400 working in apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u7 (ie
Hi Antoine,
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 15:45:20 CEST Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> As I mentioned in the #858373 bug report, I started looking at fixing
> the regression introduced by the 2.2.22-13+deb7u8 upload, part of
> DLA-841-1. The problem occurs when a CGI(d) ErrorDocument is configured
> to han
And then, obviously, I forget the patch.
Sorry for the noise.
--
The secret of life is to have no fear; it's the only way to function.
- Stokely Carmichael
diff -Nru apache2-2.2.22/debian/changelog apache2-2.2.22/debian/changelog
--- apache2-2.2.22/debian/changelog 2017-0
Hi,
(Sorry for the large CC list, but I am hoping to get a broad approval of
the next changes for this in order to avoid previous mistakes. ;) In
particular, I'd be very grateful for some input by Stefan considering
his knowledge of the Apache codebase and how ... exotic this problems
is.)
As I m
