Re: Re: gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-23 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:09:20PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Tuesday 22 July 2014 22:49:34 Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > sure. I think the distinction / meaning of "reserved" is just > > "unreleased"... > > Take a look at DLA/list's brot

Re: Re: gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 22:49:34 Holger Levsen wrote: > On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Raphael Geissert wrote: > sure. I think the distinction / meaning of "reserved" is just > "unreleased"... Take a look at DLA/list's brother DSA/list; at times entries are added days in advance. Just make sure to u

Re: gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > +reserved DLA-0017-1 tor - new upstream version > > +reserved DLA-0016-1 libxml2 - security update > Could we please not have those "reserved" ids? just add the entry and use > it. sure. I think the distinction / meaning of "reserved" is

gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, On Monday 14 July 2014 16:33:25 Holger Levsen wrote: > Index: data/DLA/list > === > --- data/DLA/list (revision 27711) > +++ data/DLA/list (working copy) > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > +reserved DLA-0017-1 tor - new upstream vers