On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 06:35:19AM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Indeed, that sound like a sensible approach. I can file the removal bug,
> if that is OK to you.
Please do so, thanks.
Cheers,
Moritz
El 08/08/24 a las 23:06, Moritz Mühlenhoff escribió:
> Am Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 09:31:31PM +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > So the package can be safely removed I would say and so my proposal
> > would be to ask for removal of iotjs in the last bullseye point
> > release.
> >
> > What do you
Am Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 09:31:31PM +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> So the package can be safely removed I would say and so my proposal
> would be to ask for removal of iotjs in the last bullseye point
> release.
>
> What do you think?
Agreed, that sounds best.
Cheers,
Moritz
Hi Santiago,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 03:07:51PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As suggested by Moritz, giving the status of iotjs, I think it is not
> possible to support it during the bullseye LTS period. iotjs was removed
> from unstable (and bookworm when it was testing) nea
Hi all,
As suggested by Moritz, giving the status of iotjs, I think it is not
possible to support it during the bullseye LTS period. iotjs was removed
from unstable (and bookworm when it was testing) nearly two years ago:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1354004/removed-10715-1-from-unstable/.
It
