Re: asterisk support

2016-11-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Brian May wrote: > I noticed that Asterisk was marked EOL for Debian squeeze; just wondered > what the reasons were, and if these reasons apply to wheezy? The reasons were just that it's a non-trivial package to support. It tends to have regular security issues and upstream su

Re: asterisk support

2016-11-23 Thread Brian May
"Santiago R.R." writes: > Not sure about the reasons for squeeze, but Thorsten has already handled > one upload for wheezy. You can look a two mail threads about its history > on wheezy: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/04/msg00011.html > https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/04/ms

Re: asterisk support

2016-11-23 Thread Santiago R.R.
Hi, El 23/11/16 a las 18:02, Brian May escribió: > Hello, > > I noticed that Asterisk was marked EOL for Debian squeeze; just wondered > what the reasons were, and if these reasons apply to wheezy? Not sure about the reasons for squeeze, but Thorsten has already handled one upload for wheezy. Yo

asterisk support

2016-11-22 Thread Brian May
Hello, I noticed that Asterisk was marked EOL for Debian squeeze; just wondered what the reasons were, and if these reasons apply to wheezy? Thought I better check first before looking too much into the 3 security issues. Thanks -- Brian May https://linuxpenguins.xyz/brian/