On 2016-05-17 10:54:50, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I would say just go ahead, and we'll need to do a similar sweep in
> data/CVE/list later as well.
>
> I'll mark this on my TODO and will do so tomorrow if no one else steps
> up.
Just for the record: I was confused. If the DLA is done and processed
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> It's hard to tell without redoing the exact same process you did
> yourself. :p
Ok, I will go ahead. Will pay particular attention this time, see if my
email goes missing again.
--
Brian May
On 2016-05-16 19:13:28, Brian May wrote:
> Brian May writes:
>
>> Any objections by anybody if I upload Antoine Beaupré's packages to
>> Debian, this Monday morning at Melbourne timezone?
>
> Done.
>
> Next step, the DLA. I went through the changelog and remove entries that
> are already marked as
Brian May writes:
> Any objections by anybody if I upload Antoine Beaupré's packages to
> Debian, this Monday morning at Melbourne timezone?
Done.
Next step, the DLA. I went through the changelog and remove entries that
are already marked as fixed in the security tracker. I think we need to
mar
"Simon Iremonger (debian)" writes:
>>> So there's *another* escalation through Qemu/HVM to backport. I wonder
>>> if it's worth postponing this upload?
> By the looks of things that only affects HVM mode and only with
> a non-default video adapter.
>
> I think the other patches actually being rel
>> So there's *another* escalation through Qemu/HVM to backport. I wonder
>> if it's worth postponing this upload?
By the looks of things that only affects HVM mode and only with
a non-default video adapter.
I think the other patches actually being released is more important in
short-term. Be awa
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> So there's *another* escalation through Qemu/HVM to backport. I wonder
> if it's worth postponing this upload?
>
> I have had good feedback about the above binary packages, by the
> way. They can be considered tested and working - unfortunately, I will
> not have time to
On 2016-05-04 17:09:39, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR: debdiff below, features only changes to debian/changelog and
> debian/patches (apart from the upstream upgrade of course). Binary
> packages in:
Obviously, something *had* to come up here to make this incomplete
again:
http://xenbits
Hi,
TL;DR: debdiff below, features only changes to debian/changelog and
debian/patches (apart from the upstream upgrade of course). Binary
packages in:
https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/wheezy-lts/
Long story follows...
So I *believe* I have correctly completed the backport of
