It was an internal discussion about security boundaries that were(n't)
crossed as a result of the vulnerability and the decision of the researcher
who discovered the issue that a CVE wasn't warranted.
Regards,
Rajiv
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:31 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> *** CAUTION: This
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:58:31AM -0700, Rajiv Motwani wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> Those CVEs were registered in error and were requested to be listed as
> REJECTED. There are no plans to re-register these issues under new
> identifiers.
Out of interest, can you elaborate on this a bit more? W
Hi Sylvain,
Those CVEs were registered in error and were requested to be listed as
REJECTED. There are no plans to re-register these issues under new
identifiers.
Regards,
Rajiv
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 8:54 AM Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> *** CAUTION: This email was sent from an EXTERNAL source. T
Hello,
I'm part of the Debian LTS Team and we would like to track which shipped
versions of python-babel are affected by the vulnerability described in
your advisory TRA-2021-14.
https://fr.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-14
The Advisory Timeline shows that CVE-2021-20095 was assigned
