Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-17 Thread Brian May
Markus Koschany writes: > Don't forget to use Inline-PGP for signing the e-mails. :) Yes, did that. Oh wait, maybe I signed with the wrong key. My old key, not my new one. Ooops. Apologies for that, will resend the DLAs. -- Brian May

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 18.05.2016 um 00:22 schrieb Brian May: > Antoine Beaupré writes: > >> Indeed, sorry I missed that. Then let me rephrase: >> >> Brian, do you still intend to send that DLA? :) > > I did. My emails appears to have gone missing somewhere along the way > :-( > Don't forget to use Inline-PGP for

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-17 Thread Brian May
Antoine Beaupré writes: > Indeed, sorry I missed that. Then let me rephrase: > > Brian, do you still intend to send that DLA? :) I did. My emails appears to have gone missing somewhere along the way :-( -- Brian May

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-17 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2016-05-17 11:24:29, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 17.05.2016 um 16:59 schrieb Antoine Beaupré: >> Reducing CCs. >> >> On 2016-05-14 04:19:50, Brian May wrote: >>> Antoine Beaupré writes: >>> I reviewed the patch quickly, nothing strikes me as completely wrong, but I am not currently i

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 17.05.2016 um 16:59 schrieb Antoine Beaupré: > Reducing CCs. > > On 2016-05-14 04:19:50, Brian May wrote: >> Antoine Beaupré writes: >> >>> I reviewed the patch quickly, nothing strikes me as completely wrong, >>> but I am not currently in a position to test the patchset. >> >> Unless there ar

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-17 Thread Antoine Beaupré
Reducing CCs. On 2016-05-14 04:19:50, Brian May wrote: > Antoine Beaupré writes: > >> I reviewed the patch quickly, nothing strikes me as completely wrong, >> but I am not currently in a position to test the patchset. > > Unless there are any objections I plan on rechecking this and uploading > t

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-14 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:28:50pm +1000, Brian May wrote: > Added CC Debian Libidn Team > > I now have fixed the packages libidn packages initially produced by > Alessandro Ghedini and destined for wheezy-security and jessie-security. > They now build fine. > > In particular, for the Jessie ver

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-14 Thread Brian May
Antoine Beaupré writes: > I reviewed the patch quickly, nothing strikes me as completely wrong, > but I am not currently in a position to test the patchset. Unless there are any objections I plan on rechecking this and uploading this to wheezy-security, Monday, Melbourne timezone. -- Brian May

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-12 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2016-05-09 03:28:50, Brian May wrote: > Added CC Debian Libidn Team > > I now have fixed the packages libidn packages initially produced by > Alessandro Ghedini and destined for wheezy-security and jessie-security. > They now build fine. > > In particular, for the Jessie version I had to edit t

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-09 Thread Brian May
Added CC Debian Libidn Team I now have fixed the packages libidn packages initially produced by Alessandro Ghedini and destined for wheezy-security and jessie-security. They now build fine. In particular, for the Jessie version I had to edit the Makefile.am to prevent it rebuilding the documenta

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-06 Thread Brian May
Brian May writes: > I see that there are two versions of this work; however I will have a > look at the above and see if I can stil reproduce the Jessie build > errors. Looks like your patch modifies files such as lib/nfkc.c which have been declared the source to the documentation. This trigger

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-05-06 Thread Brian May
Alessandro Ghedini writes: > FWIW I already prepared wheezy and jessie packages for this a while ago: > https://people.debian.org/~ghedo/libidn_1.25-2+deb7u1.diff > https://people.debian.org/~ghedo/libidn_1.29-1+deb8u1.diff Was there any progress made on this? I see that there are two versions

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-04-22 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:17:19pm -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2016-04-16 18:46:50, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> (Fixed list address, sorry for the duplicate.) > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have looked at porting the securi

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-04-22 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2016-04-16 18:46:50, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> (Fixed list address, sorry for the duplicate.) >> >> Hi, >> >> I have looked at porting the security fixes on the libidn package from >> squeeze to wheezy. As usual, signed test

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-04-16 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > (Fixed list address, sorry for the duplicate.) > > Hi, > > I have looked at porting the security fixes on the libidn package from > squeeze to wheezy. As usual, signed test packages are available here: > > https://people.debian.o