Re: buster update for jackson-databind

2021-04-24 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello, On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:21 PM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Fine with me. A buster-pu should be sufficient unless the security team > > thinks > > differently. > Ack, agreed. Thanks, opened #987489 for tracking. And thanks Salvatore for already doing it. - u

Re: buster update for jackson-databind

2021-04-19 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:40:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 19.04.2021, 13:15 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > > Hello, > > > > There are 18 no-dsa marked entries for jackson-databind for buster, > > the same ones I fixed for jessie and also the same ones that I intend

Re: buster update for jackson-databind

2021-04-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am Montag, den 19.04.2021, 13:15 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > Hello, > > There are 18 no-dsa marked entries for jackson-databind for buster, > the same ones I fixed for jessie and also the same ones that I intend > to work on for stretch. It'd be thus unfair if those are pending in > buster