Hi,
On 06/03/2020 07:52, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
>> FYI it seems none of your messages made it to the Xerces c-dev
mailing list:
>>
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xerces-c-dev/202001.mbox/browser
>>
>> Are you still working on a patch?
>
> unfortunately, I did not manage to find time for m
Hi Sylvain,
> FYI it seems none of your messages made it to the Xerces c-dev mailing list:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xerces-c-dev/202001.mbox/browser
>
> Are you still working on a patch?
unfortunately, I did not manage to find time for my LTS duties in february
and I doubt tha
FYI it seems none of your messages made it to the Xerces c-dev mailing list:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xerces-c-dev/202001.mbox/browser
Are you still working on a patch?
- Sylvain
On 30/01/2020 09:16, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes you answered my questions. Please go ahead to
Hi
Yes you answered my questions. Please go ahead to prepare a patch.
/ Ola
Den tors 30 jan. 2020 09:09Hugo Lefeuvre skrev:
> Hi Ola,
>
> > > A DTDEntityDecl object is allocated and pushed into the ReaderMgr
> stack.
> > > ReaderMgr does not own the stack's content, so objects neither get
> fr
Hi Ola,
> > A DTDEntityDecl object is allocated and pushed into the ReaderMgr stack.
> > ReaderMgr does not own the stack's content, so objects neither get freed on
> > ReaderMgr::popReader(), nor on ReaderMgr::~ReaderMgr().
>
> And it should not be freed by the code popping the object?
I don't
Hi
I have some questions below. I think your approach looks sensible but I'm
not sure I have understood the description correctly.
See below.
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 17:37, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> [c-dev senders: please CC me, I did not subscribe to the mailing list]
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a look at
