On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > > - improving the security infrastructure
> >
> > That has certainly the best net positive from my point of view.
>
> From my point of view too. But I'm not sure I would put the
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > - improving the security infrastructure
>
> That has certainly the best net positive from my point of view.
>From my point of view too. But I'm not sure I would put the same
emphasis as you on dak related work.
I would possibly suggest to work
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Guido Günther wrote:
> Should we apply the attached patch to templates/lts-update-planned.txt
> then?
Yes, we should.
> Salvatore suggested to move to a newer version of nss in all suites (and
> keeping it that way). This plus adding some autpkgtests would be
> something
Hi,
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:01:47PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > with the current LTS funding level and the somewhat limited scope of
> > squeeze,
> > and until the LTS team takes care of wheezy, we are likely to have some
> > spare hours to invest into improvi
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:01:47PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> with the current LTS funding level and the somewhat limited scope of squeeze,
> and until the LTS team takes care of wheezy, we are likely to have some
> spare hours to invest into improving the long-term s
