Hi Balint, Seb,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 06:53:14AM +, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> On 2017-03-02, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > I have prepared a patch to optionally prepare the template using:
> > bin/gen-DSA package.changes
>
> That looks OK, just merge it and we can adapt it later on if needed
On 2017-03-02, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> I have prepared a patch to optionally prepare the template using:
> bin/gen-DSA package.changes
That looks OK, just merge it and we can adapt it later on if needed (for
instance it would need to handle multiple changes files, for when both
stable and oldstabl
Hi,
Thanks for all the input!
2017-02-28 9:12 GMT+01:00 Sébastien Delafond :
> On Feb/28, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> Maybe we should be able to pass the name of the .changes file to
>> gen-DSA, and then the script can go and use all the information from
>> there?
>
> Implementation-wise, this soun
On Feb/28, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Maybe we should be able to pass the name of the .changes file to
> gen-DSA, and then the script can go and use all the information from
> there?
Implementation-wise, this sounds like a much more sensible approach, but
since the *.changes files may not live on th
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> I agree: this is more of a documentation problem (I always double-check
> the version manually in the *changes files, prior to writing the DSA),
> and not something that's easily fixed in gen-DSA itself.
>
> However, if you acknowledge the limitati
On Feb/28, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Since I made mistakes in setting the package version in DLA texts
> > (and I'm not alone ;-)) I came up with the attached patch which
> > makes gen-DLA and guess the proper one.
> >
> > If both teams like it I'll push it to the repo.
>
> I can only speak
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:43:23AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Balint,
>
> Thanks for bringing up that topic!
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:48:42AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since I made mistakes in setting the package version in DLA texts (and
> > I'm not alo
Hi Balint,
Thanks for bringing up that topic!
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:48:42AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I made mistakes in setting the package version in DLA texts (and
> I'm not alone ;-)) I came up with the attached patch which makes
> gen-DLA and guess the proper one.
>
