Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 19:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > As I understand it, packages are never moved directly from oldstable- > > security to archive.debian.org.  Normally they are copied to oldstable > > in a final point release,

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > As I understand it, packages are never moved directly from oldstable- > security to archive.debian.org. Normally they are copied to oldstable > in a final point release, and then moved to archive.debian.org. In > this case, there was a poi

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 16:48 +0200, Tom Turelinckx wrote: > Hello Paul, > > This approach works fine, thanks for the suggestion: > > deb http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free > deb-src http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free > > deb http://ftp.be.debian

RE: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-04 Thread Tom Turelinckx
icial port... Thanks for your help, Tom -Original Message- From: paul.is.w...@gmail.com [mailto:paul.is.w...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paul Wise Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 5:37 AM To: Tom Turelinckx Cc: debian-lts@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheez

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Tom Turelinckx wrote: > Jessie is not available for sparc. If you are actually using sparc I would recommend you look at migrating to and assisting the sparc64 porting efforts. Or reviving sparc if you need 32-bit SPARC. Or switch to another architecture. https:/

RE: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-03 Thread Tom Turelinckx
n-lts@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security Hello Tom, Am 03.05.2016 um 18:23 schrieb Tom Turelinckx: > Hello Markus, > > Jessie is not available for sparc. True. sparc64 is the only non-official release architecture that comes somewhat c

RE: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-03 Thread Tom Turelinckx
packages been archived somewhere? What is the recommended sources.list entry to access them? Thanks for your help, Tom -Original Message- From: Markus Koschany [mailto:a...@debian.org] Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 12:23 PM To: Tom Turelinckx Cc: debian-lts@lists.debian.org Subject: Re

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-05-03 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello Tom, Am 03.05.2016 um 18:23 schrieb Tom Turelinckx: > Hello Markus, > > Jessie is not available for sparc. True. sparc64 is the only non-official release architecture that comes somewhat close. > > My /etc/apt/sources.list looks like this: > > deb http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-04-30 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 30.04.2016 um 12:17 schrieb Markus Koschany: > Am 29.04.2016 um 20:18 schrieb Tom Turelinckx: >> Hi, >> >> With the non-lts architectures such as sparc now removed from wheezy/updates >> on security.debian.org, what is the recommended way to access the archived >> security updates on non-lts a

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-04-30 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 29.04.2016 um 20:18 schrieb Tom Turelinckx: > Hi, > > With the non-lts architectures such as sparc now removed from wheezy/updates > on security.debian.org, what is the recommended way to access the archived > security updates on non-lts architectures? Is using wheezy-proposed-updates > the

Re: Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-04-29 Thread Tom Turelinckx
Hi, With the non-lts architectures such as sparc now removed from wheezy/updates on security.debian.org, what is the recommended way to access the archived security updates on non-lts architectures? Is using wheezy-proposed-updates the recommended approach? Thanks, Tom

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-04-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Ansgar, thanks for your work! On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > I'm not quite sure if uploading new packages will trigger a mirror > push. I think that only happens when uploads to policy queues are > processed and might need to be adapted. I guess that if you are not able to

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-04-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Aurelien Jarno writes: > On 2016-04-26 23:52, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> please remove the non-lts architectures for wheezy-security from >> wanna-build and the buildds. Only amd64, armel, armhf and i386 are >> still supported. >> >> It would also be nice if build logs for wheezy-security wou

Re: Please remove non-lts architectures from wheezy-security

2016-04-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-04-26 23:52, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Hi, > > please remove the non-lts architectures for wheezy-security from > wanna-build and the buildds. Only amd64, armel, armhf and i386 are > still supported. > > It would also be nice if build logs for wheezy-security would be visible > on buildd