On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:28:15AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:12:23PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > > On 2016-03-29 16:28:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > > > On 2016-03-26 04:33
On 2016-05-19 02:28:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:12:23PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > On 2016-03-29 16:28:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > > On 2016-03-26 04:33:29, Guido Günther wro
Hi Guido,
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:12:23PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On 2016-03-29 16:28:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > > On 2016-03-26 04:33:29, Guido Günther wrote:
> > >> Thanks for reviewing this! I was about to look in
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:12:23PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-03-29 16:28:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On 2016-03-26 04:33:29, Guido Günther wrote:
> >> Thanks for reviewing this! I was about to look into more recent nss
> >> issues after handling dhcpcd but since you're at it, go ah
On 2016-03-29 16:28:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2016-03-26 04:33:29, Guido Günther wrote:
>> Thanks for reviewing this! I was about to look into more recent nss
>> issues after handling dhcpcd but since you're at it, go ahead!
>>
>> Note that we still have CVE-2015-4000 which would most easily