Re: Re: gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-23 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:09:20PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Tuesday 22 July 2014 22:49:34 Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > sure. I think the distinction / meaning of "reserved" is just > > "unreleased"... > > Take a look at DLA/list's brot

Re: Re: gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 22:49:34 Holger Levsen wrote: > On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Raphael Geissert wrote: > sure. I think the distinction / meaning of "reserved" is just > "unreleased"... Take a look at DLA/list's brother DSA/list; at times entries are added days in advance. Just make sure to u

Re: gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 22. Juli 2014, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > +reserved DLA-0017-1 tor - new upstream version > > +reserved DLA-0016-1 libxml2 - security update > Could we please not have those "reserved" ids? just add the entry and use > it. sure. I think the distinction / meaning of "reserved" is

gen-DLA (was: Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015)

2014-07-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, On Monday 14 July 2014 16:33:25 Holger Levsen wrote: > Index: data/DLA/list > === > --- data/DLA/list (revision 27711) > +++ data/DLA/list (working copy) > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > +reserved DLA-0017-1 tor - new upstream vers

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-14 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 14. Juli 2014, Michael Gilbert wrote: > I just commited an initial list the existing LTS announcements to > data/DLA/list, using the same style as data/DSA/list in > secure-testing. I chose DLA based on the name of the > Debian-Lts-Announce mailing list. ok, let's settle on that th

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> Hmm, according to your announce this upload fixes CVE-2014-4699 which has >> DSA-2972-1. >> Or DSA-2949-1 for CVE-2014-3145. > > so let's roll a dice? IMO there is no problem / muc

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hmm, according to your announce this upload fixes CVE-2014-4699 which has > DSA-2972-1. > Or DSA-2949-1 for CVE-2014-3145. so let's roll a dice? IMO there is no problem / much overhead in keeping a track of some IDs and there are some iss

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: As all (most?) LTS updates have a corresponding DSA number why not simply replace DSA by LTS? the linux-2.6 is my first counter example, I'm sure there will be more. Hmm, according to your announce this upload fixes CVE-2014-4699 which has DSA-2972

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Why not simply LTS-0008 (or whatever number this one is)? > How do you sync two people working on different packages? I'd suggest to pre-allocate them via a file in git. > As all (most?) LTS updates have a corresponding DSA number why

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Michael Gilbert wrote: Why not simply LTS-0008 (or whatever number this one is)? How do you sync two people working on different packages? As all (most?) LTS updates have a corresponding DSA number why not simply replace DSA by LTS? Thorsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Samstag, 12. Juli 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: > I've refrained from adding "LTS6A-2014-015" to the subject of the linux-2.6 > announcement, as well as from including it in the body. But I think we > should have some ID there, and I propose to use "Long Term Support for > Debian 6 Announcemen

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:08:23PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 12.07.14 21:27, schrieb Holger Levsen: > > I've refrained from adding "LTS6A-2014-015" to the subject of the > > linux-2.6 announcement, as well as from including it in the body. >

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-13 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.07.14 21:27, schrieb Holger Levsen: > I've refrained from adding "LTS6A-2014-015" to the subject of the > linux-2.6 announcement, as well as from including it in the body. > But I think we should have some ID there, and I propose to use > "Long T

Re: LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-12 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > I've refrained from adding "LTS6A-2014-015" to the subject of the linux-2.6 > announcement, as well as from including it in the body. But I think we should > have some ID there, and I propose to use "Long Term Support for Debian 6 > A

LTS-ID : LTS6A-2014-015

2014-07-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I've refrained from adding "LTS6A-2014-015" to the subject of the linux-2.6 announcement, as well as from including it in the body. But I think we should have some ID there, and I propose to use "Long Term Support for Debian 6 Announcement", or short, LTS6A for this. What do you think? c