Re: Implications of LTS on backports

2014-05-23 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Hi, > > With LTS support being planned for squeeze, it would be good to also keep > squeeze-backports{,-sloppy} open for business (for packages from wheezy, > of course); have there been any discussions about this? sarge and etch > backports got cl

Implications of LTS on backports

2014-05-23 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Hi, With LTS support being planned for squeeze, it would be good to also keep squeeze-backports{,-sloppy} open for business (for packages from wheezy, of course); have there been any discussions about this? sarge and etch backports got closed at the same time as security support was terminated for