Thanks a lot!
// Ola
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi Salvatore
> >
> > Thanks for quick answer.
> >
> > Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
> >
Hi Ola,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Salvatore
>
> Thanks for quick answer.
>
> Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
> processed yet.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-changes/2016/05/msg00063.html
Regards,
Salvatore
Hi Ola,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Salvatore
>
> Thanks for quick answer.
>
> Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
> processed yet.
>
> A CVE request was made half a year ago, but none assigned that I could find.
Yes
Hi Salvatore
Thanks for quick answer.
Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
processed yet.
A CVE request was made half a year ago, but none assigned that I could find.
Regarding the addition if a line to data/CVE/list. Shall I add it to a
dummy id because the
Hi,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:11:42PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have now fixed ruby-mail and the problem described there did not have a
> CVE identifier.
> See here:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ruby-mail
> Instead it has a TEMP-000-8B2928 identif
Hi
I have now fixed ruby-mail and the problem described there did not have a
CVE identifier.
See here:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ruby-mail
Instead it has a TEMP-000-8B2928 identifier.
How do I mark that one as fixed?
I could not add TEMP-... to to gen-DLA com