Re: Fixing minor/unimportant issues via DLA on demand

2020-03-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, just to add a minor point on what Sylvain has said here: On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:33:24PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Any DD can directly update Jessie following: > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development > with no additional privileges (that's what postgresql's maintainer does). > > Y

Re: Fixing minor/unimportant issues via DLA on demand

2020-03-20 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, On 20/03/2020 18:04, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:33 PM Sylvain Beucler wrote: >> These are 2 cases (request from Jessie user or from maintainer) that I >> yet to see :) >> Do you have a specific case in mind? > I do. But I am not very sure if I should mention the user thi

Re: Fixing minor/unimportant issues via DLA on demand

2020-03-20 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Sylvain, On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:33 PM Sylvain Beucler wrote: > These are 2 cases (request from Jessie user or from maintainer) that I > yet to see :) > Do you have a specific case in mind? I do. But I am not very sure if I should mention the user thingy publicly or not. Anyway, the other c

Re: Fixing minor/unimportant issues via DLA on demand

2020-03-20 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, On 20/03/2020 01:37, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > I was curious to know if we can (or rather, we should) fix some > CVE(s), which has been marked minor/unimportant by the Security team > or/and the person at front-desk, if there's a demand for it (meaning, > some Jessie user requested it)? > Or, if

Fixing minor/unimportant issues via DLA on demand

2020-03-19 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi all, I was curious to know if we can (or rather, we should) fix some CVE(s), which has been marked minor/unimportant by the Security team or/and the person at front-desk, if there's a demand for it (meaning, some Jessie user requested it)? Or, if the maintainer (upstream or downstream or both)