Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Thomas, > Thanks to both of you Chris and Guido! No problem. Packages available now and I've just announced DLA 773-4. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-10 Thread Thomas Martin
Thanks to both of you Chris and Guido! Cheers! Thomas 2017-01-09 23:16 GMT+01:00 Chris Lamb : > Guido Günther wrote: > >> I think the rule (as I understood it) is "every change to *-security" >> gets a D{S,L}A so people know why things are changing in these suites. > > Yeah, that makes sense. I w

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Guido Günther wrote: > I think the rule (as I understood it) is "every change to *-security" > gets a D{S,L}A so people know why things are changing in these suites. Yeah, that makes sense. I was perhaps thinking there might be another approach. :) I've just uploaded python-crypto_2.6-4+deb7u7_a

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-09 Thread Guido Günther
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 08:40:31PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Guido Günther wrote: > > > Flake8 does the same internally what the test does (using the > > multiprocess module): > > Getcha, okay. So, yet another python-crypto upload will be needed? *grin* > > Now, would it warrant a DLA announcem

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Guido Günther wrote: > Flake8 does the same internally what the test does (using the > multiprocess module): Getcha, okay. So, yet another python-crypto upload will be needed? *grin* Now, would it warrant a DLA announcement? It seems noisy to announce simply fixing the testsuite to work under no

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-09 Thread Guido Günther
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:52:58PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Guido Günther wrote: > > > I had the same problem with flake8 in gbp and used > > > > flake8 -j1 > > > > to work around this. I think we can only skip the patch if hitting a > > EPERM. > > I'm a little confused by the mention of

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Guido Günther wrote: > I had the same problem with flake8 in gbp and used > > flake8 -j1 > > to work around this. I think we can only skip the patch if hitting a > EPERM. I'm a little confused by the mention of flake8 here - the test itself is requiring access to the multiprocessing library

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-09 Thread Guido Günther
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:02:06PM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > > Still no update available for [python-crypto] versions 2.6-4+deb7u6 also > > (for others archs than amd64). > > > > I tried to build 2.6-4+deb7u6 on i386 and it worked so maybe > > autobuilders doesn't know that there

Re: DLA 773-1 and DLA 773-2

2017-01-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Thomas, > Still no update available for [python-crypto] versions 2.6-4+deb7u6 also > (for others archs than amd64). > > I tried to build 2.6-4+deb7u6 on i386 and it worked so maybe > autobuilders doesn't know that there is a new version of python-crypto > ? It seems like the tests are failing