Re: CVE-2014-4610: Integer Overflow in FFmpeg LZO implementation

2014-07-14 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:10:50AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > As this seems to be a rather important security bug, I think a backport > would be useful in this case. Raphael wanted to update ffmpeg in squeeze. I'm adding him to CC, so that he can fold in the patch. > I'm afraid I don't

Re: CVE-2014-4610: Integer Overflow in FFmpeg LZO implementation

2014-07-09 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi, On 01.07.2014 16:27, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:01:35AM +1000, Matt Palmer wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:30:11PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > > I'd like to inform you that ffmpeg 0.5.10-1 in squeeze is > > > vulnerable to CVE-2014-4610 [1]. > > > The

Re: CVE-2014-4610: Integer Overflow in FFmpeg LZO implementation

2014-07-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:01:35AM +1000, Matt Palmer wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:30:11PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > I'd like to inform you that ffmpeg 0.5.10-1 in squeeze is vulnerable > > to CVE-2014-4610 [1]. > > The fix [2] should be easily backportable. > > Thanks fo

Re: CVE-2014-4610: Integer Overflow in FFmpeg LZO implementation

2014-06-30 Thread Matt Palmer
Hi, On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:30:11PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > I'd like to inform you that ffmpeg 0.5.10-1 in squeeze is vulnerable > to CVE-2014-4610 [1]. > The fix [2] should be easily backportable. Thanks for taking the time to send this info through. This bug has been marked as "wo

CVE-2014-4610: Integer Overflow in FFmpeg LZO implementation

2014-06-27 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi, I'd like to inform you that ffmpeg 0.5.10-1 in squeeze is vulnerable to CVE-2014-4610 [1]. The fix [2] should be easily backportable. Best regards, Andreas 1: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q2/668 2: https://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=d6af26c55c1ea30f85a7d9edbc373f5