[Adding 922...@bugs.debian.org to CC for completeness / BTS archive]
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > So using the ssize_t version that preserves the sizes of the arguments
> > and return type of the function is the safer choice, regardless of
> > upstream's claim that the function is private.
>
> Upstream
Hi Mattias,
> Is the aim of this discussion still to determine which version of the
> proposed change to use? The original int version, or the updated
> ssize_t version?
I'm sorry to hear in your mail that you are feeling frustrated
("derail into a general complaint…" etc.) as our shared goal is
lör 2019-02-16 klockan 22:05 + skrev Ben Hutchings:
> On Sat, 2019-02-16 at 06:43 +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> > lör 2019-02-16 klockan 00:12 +0100 skrev Chris Lamb:
> > > Hi Mattias,
> > >
> > > > What exactly do you want to run past upstream? It is not clear to me
> > > > what you are requ
On Sat, 2019-02-16 at 06:43 +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> lör 2019-02-16 klockan 00:12 +0100 skrev Chris Lamb:
> > Hi Mattias,
> >
> > > What exactly do you want to run past upstream? It is not clear to me
> > > what you are requesting here.
> >
> > Your change to the patch, no? :)
> >
> >
> >
lör 2019-02-16 klockan 00:12 +0100 skrev Chris Lamb:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> > What exactly do you want to run past upstream? It is not clear to me
> > what you are requesting here.
>
> Your change to the patch, no? :)
>
>
> Regards,
>
OK.
https://sourceforge.net/p/gsoap2/bugs/1236/
Matti
Hi Mattias,
> What exactly do you want to run past upstream? It is not clear to me
> what you are requesting here.
Your change to the patch, no? :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
fre 2019-02-15 klockan 22:15 +0100 skrev Chris Lamb:
> Hi Mattias,
> > The patch was based on the suggested fix from upstream which uses int.
> > But I agree ssize_t is a better choice.
>
> Thanks for attaching an updated debdiff. Can you run this past upstream?
>
>
> Regards,
What exactly do y
Hi Mattias,
> The patch was based on the suggested fix from upstream which uses int.
> But I agree ssize_t is a better choice.
Thanks for attaching an updated debdiff. Can you run this past upstream?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-
fre 2019-02-15 klockan 17:56 +0100 skrev Chris Lamb:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>
> > Given the reference to cookies in the upstream advisory, I think the
> > actual bug is
>
> […]
>
> Thanks for looking into this. For the avoidance of doubt I will not
> proceed with an upload.
>
> With my "fro
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Given the reference to cookies in the upstream advisory, I think the
> actual bug is
[…]
Thanks for looking into this. For the avoidance of doubt I will not
proceed with an upload.
With my "front desk" hat on, I've also added a link in the data/
CVE/list to this thread
On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 13:39 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 15/02/2019 13:31, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Hi Mattias,
> >
> > > I submitted this jessie update to the release team, but was informed to
> > > contact you about it instead. What do I do?
> >
> > Indeed, they have sent you to the r
On 15/02/2019 13:31, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
>
>> I submitted this jessie update to the release team, but was informed to
>> contact you about it instead. What do I do?
>
> Indeed, they have sent you to the right place. :) As-per:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development
>
> … we w
Hi Mattias,
> I submitted this jessie update to the release team, but was informed to
> contact you about it instead. What do I do?
Indeed, they have sent you to the right place. :) As-per:
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development
… we would fix CVE-2019-7659 via a jessie "LTS" security upload
by "Adam D. Barratt"
(Re: Bug#922384: jessie-pu: package gsoap/2.8.17-1+deb8u2)
Datum: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:36:08 +
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the release.debian.org package:
#922384: jessie-pu: package gsoap/2.8.17-1+deb8
14 matches
Mail list logo
